Tag Archives: theology

A Biblical Study on the Spirit

Heretofore, the concepts and several studies (A to N) focusing on the thread of scripture and the Holy Spirit have been combined. 1

In the following section, we connect Romans 8:26-28 with the High Priestly role of Christ in John 17 regarding the Spirit’s interceding according to the will of God, which, in the Trinity, includes Christ.

Connecting these two powerhouse passages reveals a beautiful, “symphonic” view of intercession within the Trinity. In this divine arrangement, the Son and the Spirit work in perfect harmony to align the believer’s life with the Father’s will.

Scriptural Thread: Section A

1. The Dual Intercession

While we often focus on Christ as our Intercessor, the New Testament actually presents a two-fold intercessory support system:

  • The Son (John 17): Intercedes externally at the right hand of the Father (Hebrews 7:25), providing the legal and relational basis for our standing.
  • The Spirit (Romans 8): Intercedes internally within the believer, translating our “groanings” into the language of heaven.

2. The Mechanics of the Divine Will

In Romans 8:26-27, the Spirit searches our hearts and intercedes “according to the will of God.” This is where the connection to John 17 becomes critical.

In John 17 (the High Priestly Prayer), Jesus explicitly defines what that “will” looks like. He prays for:

  • Unity: “That they may be one as we are one” (John 17:11).
  • Sanctification: “Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth” (John 17:17).
  • Glory: “That they may see my glory” (John 17:24).

When the Spirit intercedes for you in your moments of weakness (Romans 8:26), He isn’t just asking for general “help.” He is actively groaning for the very things Jesus demanded in His High Priestly role. The Spirit takes the specific, high-level petitions of Christ and applies them to the “weakness” of your current circumstances.

3. The Trinitarian Feedback Loop

Because Christ is part of the Trinity, the “will of God” mentioned in Romans 8:27 is inherently the will of Christ.

Aspect Christ in John 17 The Spirit in Romans 8
Location Before the Father’s Throne Within the Believer’s Heart
The Goal Conformity to the Divine Nature Conformity to the Image of the Son
The “Weakness” “I am no longer in the world… but they are.” “We do not know what to pray for as we ought.”

4. The “All Things” Connection (Romans 8:28)

We often quote Romans 8:28 (“All things work together for good”) in isolation. However, in this Trinitarian context, “the good” isn’t just a happy ending—it is the fulfillment of Christ’s prayer in John 17. The “good” is that we would be kept from the evil one, sanctified in truth, and eventually brought to glory. The Spirit’s intercession ensures that even our deepest trials are recycled into the fulfillment of Christ’s priestly desires.

The Result: You are caught in a divine “pincer movement.” Christ prays for your ultimate destiny from above, while the Spirit prays through your immediate pain from within. Both are seeking the exact same thing: the manifestation of God’s glory in your life.

This “internal vs. external” distinction helps clarify how they work together.

Compare John 3:5, 1 Cor 6:11, Rom 12:2, and 1 Peter 3:21 compared to: “But when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared, he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that being justified by his grace we might become heirs according to the hope of eternal life. Titus 3:4-7 ESV

In Titus 3:4–7, Paul provides a “theological anchor” that synthesizes several different aspects of the Christian experience—cleansing, transformation, and legal standing. By comparing this to our selected verses, we can see how the “washing of regeneration” and “renewal of the Holy Spirit” operate across the New Testament.

Comparative Analysis: The Mechanics of Salvation

Reference Key Theme Connection to Titus 3:5-7
John 3:5 Birth of Water & Spirit Titus 3:5 echoes Jesus’ language of “regeneration” (palingenesia). Both passages emphasize that entry into God’s kingdom requires a supernatural “re-starting” of life facilitated by the Spirit.
1 Cor 6:11 Washed, Sanctified, Justified Paul uses a similar “triad” here. Just as Titus mentions being justified by grace and washed, 1 Corinthians shows that this washing isn’t merely physical; it marks a transition from a state of sin to a state of holiness.
Rom 12:2 Renewal of the Mind This connects to the “renewal of the Holy Spirit.” While Titus focuses on the event of salvation, Romans 12 focuses on the ongoing effect. The same Spirit that regenerates us also reconfigures our cognitive and moral faculties.
1 Peter 3:21 Baptismal Appeal Peter clarifies that the “washing” isn’t about removing dirt from the body (works), but an appeal to God for a good conscience. This mirrors Titus 3:5’s claim that we are saved “not because of works… but according to his mercy.”

Scriptural Thread: Section B

1. The Source: Mercy vs. Merit

Titus 3:5 is the definitive “No” to legalism. Paul explicitly contrasts “works done by us” with “His own mercy.”

  • Connection: 1 Peter 3:21 and Titus 3 both treat the outward sign (washing/baptism) not as a human work that earns points, but as a “vessel” for God’s mercy.

2. The Means: Water and Spirit

There is a strong “sacramental” thread linking John 3:5, 1 Peter 3:21, and Titus 3:5.

  • John 3:5 speaks of being “born of water and the Spirit.”
  • Titus 3:5 speaks of the “washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit.”
  • Synthesis: These passages suggest that the Holy Spirit uses the “washing” (baptism) as the visible sign of an invisible, internal recreation. It is a “death” to the old self and a “birth” to the new.

3. The Result: Justification and Heirship

Titus 3:7 concludes that we are “justified by his grace” to become “heirs.” * Connection to 1 Cor 6:11: In both texts, the legal change (justification) is inseparable from the moral change (washing/sanctification). You cannot have the “heirship” without the “regeneration.”

  • Connection to Rom 12:2: To live as an “heir” requires the “renewal” Paul mentions. An heir of the Kingdom must think with the logic of the Kingdom, which is only possible through the Spirit’s ongoing work.

Summary of the “Golden Chain”

In Titus, we see a beautiful Trinitarian flow: The Father (Saviour) initiates mercy, the Spirit provides the washing and renewal, and this is all poured out through Jesus Christ (v. 6).

The verses cited are like individual facets of a diamond; Titus 3:4–7 is the light that shines through them all, revealing the complete picture of a person being rescued, cleansed, renamed, and given an inheritance.

Scriptural Thread: Section C

The phrase “filled with the Spirit” (and its grammatical variations) appears primarily in the writings of Luke (Gospel of Luke and Acts) and once in the writings of Paul. While it is often associated with miraculous signs, its New Testament usage reveals a deeper connection to sanctification—the process by which a believer is set apart and empowered for God’s purposes.

1. New Testament Occurrences

The term generally falls into two categories: a sovereign endowment for a specific task and a habitual state of Christian character.

Reference Context / Recipient Purpose / Manifestation
Luke 1:15 John the Baptist Set apart from the womb for prophetic ministry.
Luke 1:41 Elizabeth Prophetic exclamation/recognition of the Messiah.
Luke 1:67 Zechariah Prophetic worship and prediction (The Benedictus).
Acts 2:4 The Disciples (Pentecost) Empowerment to speak in other languages; the birth of the Church.
Acts 4:8 Peter Boldness to testify before the religious leaders (Sanhedrin).
Acts 4:31 The Believers Boldness to continue speaking the word of God despite threats.
Acts 9:17 Saul (Paul) Recovery of sight and initiation into his apostolic calling.
Acts 13:9 Paul Spiritual authority to rebuke Elymas the sorcerer.
Acts 13:52 The Disciples A state of joy and perseverance amidst persecution.
Ephesians 5:18 All Believers A command to be “continually filled,” resulting in worship and submission.

2. Defining “Filling” in Regard to Sanctification

In systematic theology, it is crucial to distinguish between the Baptism of the Spirit (which happens once at conversion, incorporating the believer into the Body of Christ) and the Filling of the Spirit (which can be repeated and increased).

A. The Yielded Life (Control)

In the Greek of Ephesians 5:18, the command is plērousthe (be filled), which is in the passive voice. This implies that the believer does not “fill themselves” but allows themselves to be controlled or permeated by the Spirit.

  • Sanctification Link: Sanctification is the process of the Spirit’s “territorial expansion” in the believer’s life. To be filled is to yield the “rooms” of one’s heart (will, intellect, emotions) to the Spirit’s influence.

B. Power for Service (Boldness)

As seen in Acts 4:8 and 4:31, filling is often linked to boldness.

  • Sanctification Link: Part of being made holy (sanctified) is the movement from self-preservation to God-glorification. The Spirit fills the believer to overcome the “fleshly” fear of man, enabling them to act with a courage that is not their own.

C. The Fruit of the Spirit (Character)

While “filling” in Acts often appears to be power, Paul’s command in Ephesians 5 connects it to joy, thankfulness, and mutual submission.

  • Sanctification Link: This is the “renewal” aspect you noted in Romans 12. A Spirit-filled person exhibits the Fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23). Sanctification is the Spirit replacing the “works of the flesh” with His own character.

3. The Distinction: Position vs. Condition

To understand how this relates to the verses you studied earlier (Titus 3, Romans 12):

  1. Regeneration (Titus 3:5): Gives you a new life.
  2. Indwelling (Romans 8:9): Gives you a new Resident.
  3. Filling (Ephesians 5:18): Gives you new Power/Control.

Sanctification is the bridge between indwelling and filling. While the Spirit always lives in the believer (positional sanctification), the believer is not always filled by the Spirit (progressive sanctification). The “filling” is the moment-by-moment experience of the Spirit’s presence dominating the believer’s conduct.

Summary

In the New Testament, being “filled with the Spirit” is the active expression of sanctification. It is the state where the Holy Spirit’s presence is so pervasive that the believer’s speech, actions, and character are dictated by the Spirit’s will rather than their own natural impulses.

To understand how the Fruit of the Spirit serves as the empirical evidence of being “filled,” we have to look at the transition from the internal work (Regeneration) to the external manifestation (Sanctification).

In the New Testament, the “filling” of the Spirit is not a static state of “feeling” holy; it is a dynamic pressure that pushes specific virtues into the believer’s life, displacing the natural “works of the flesh.”

Scriptural Thread: Section D

1. The Evidence: Character vs. Gifts

While the “filling” in Acts sometimes resulted in spiritual gifts (like tongues or prophecy), Paul’s letter to the Galatians highlights the Fruit as the definitive evidence of a life controlled by the Spirit.

  • The Works of the Flesh (Galatians 5:19-21): These are the “default settings” of human nature—discord, jealousy, fits of anger, and selfish ambition.
  • The Fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23): “Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control.”

Sanctification is essentially the process of the Spirit “pruning” the former and “cultivating” the latter. Notice that “Fruit” is singular in the Greek (karpos); it represents a unified character profile produced by the Spirit’s filling.

2. The Empirical Test: The “Pressure” Analogy

If you want to know what a sponge is filled with, you don’t look at it while it sits on the counter; you look at what comes out when it is squeezed.

In the New Testament, the “filling” of the Spirit is most visible during trials.

  • Stephen (Acts 7:55): While being stoned, he was “full of the Holy Spirit” and responded with forgiveness, mirroring Christ’s High Priestly heart.
  • Paul and Silas (Acts 16:25): While in prison, they were filled with joy and sang hymns.

This is the “Renewal” mentioned in Romans 12:2. The empirical evidence of sanctification is a supernatural response to natural pressure. Instead of the “Works of the Flesh” (anger, retaliation) leaking out, the “Fruit of the Spirit” (peace, gentleness) is produced.

3. The Relation to the Will (Self-Control)

It is a profound paradox that the final fruit listed is self-control.

  • The Logic: To be “filled with the Spirit” (yielded to God’s control) results in a person who finally has “self-control” (control over their own impulses).
  • The Connection to Titus 3: The “washing of regeneration” gives you the capacity for this new life, but the “filling” is the moment-by-moment exercise of it.

4. How the Fruit Connects the Trinity

Tying this back to your original interest in John 17 and Romans 8:

  1. The Father is the Vinedresser who prunes us (John 15:1).
  2. The Son (Christ) is the Vine; we must abide in Him to bear fruit (John 15:5).
  3. The Spirit is the “sap” or the life-force that actually produces the fruit.

When the Spirit fills you to produce “Love,” He is effectively answering Christ’s prayer in John 17:26: “that the love with which you [the Father] have loved me may be in them, and I in them.”

Final Synthesis

The Fruit is the “visible sanctification” of the believer. It proves that the “washing” of Titus 3 was effective and that the “intercession” of Romans 8 is being answered. It is the character of Jesus Christ being replicated in a human being through the agency of the Holy Spirit.

Maintaining the “filling” of the Spirit is not about earning God’s presence—which is already secured by Christ’s work—but about keeping the channels of communication and obedience open. In the New Testament, this is a cooperative effort between the believer’s will and the Spirit’s power.

Scriptural Thread: Section E

1. “Abiding” in the Word and Prayer

As noted with the High Priestly role of Christ, intercession is central to our spiritual life. To maintain the filling, we must align our minds with the “mind of the Spirit.”

  • Intake of Scripture: In Colossians 3:16, Paul says, “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly.” Interestingly, the results Paul lists here (singing, thankfulness, healthy relationships) are identical to the results of being “filled with the Spirit” in Ephesians 5:18-21.
  • The Connection: The Spirit uses the Word as the “fuel” for the filling. To be filled with the Spirit is, in practice, to be “filled” with the thoughts and priorities of Christ.

2. The “Negative” Disciplines: Do Not Grieve or Quench

The New Testament gives two specific warnings about actions that “drain” the experience of being filled:

  • Do Not Grieve the Spirit (Ephesians 4:30): We grieve the Spirit through relational sin (bitterness, anger, malice). Because the Spirit is holy, He is “pained” by unholiness in His temple. Grieving the Spirit stops the flow of His influence.
  • Do Not Quench the Spirit (1 Thessalonians 5:19): To “quench” is to throw water on a fire. We do this by resisting His prompts or devaluing His word.

3. Walking by the Spirit (Active Dependence)

In Galatians 5:16, Paul commands us to “Walk by the Spirit.” This suggests a step-by-step dependence.

  • The Practice: It is the habit of “breathing” spiritually—exhaling confession of sin and inhaling the Spirit’s power through a conscious “Yes” to God’s prompts throughout the day.
  • Sanctification Link: This is where Romans 12:2 comes alive. By choosing not to be “conformed to this world” in small, daily decisions, you create the “space” for the Spirit to fill.

4. Corporate Discipline (The “Together” Filling)

In Ephesians 5:18-21, the “filling” leads directly to communal activities: “addressing one another in psalms… submitting to one another.”

  • The Logic: You cannot be fully “Spirit-filled” in total isolation. The Spirit is the “bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:3), and His filling is often experienced most intensely within the Body of Christ.

Summary: The Cycle of Maintenance

Discipline Action Result
Abiding Saturating in Scripture The Spirit has the “tools” (truth) to work with.
Confession Not Grieving the Spirit The “channel” remains clear of relational debris.
Walking Momentary Obedience Power is applied to specific situations (e.g., patience).
Community Mutual Submission The Spirit’s love is manifested and reinforced.

This brings us full circle to Romans 8:26-28. The Spirit intercedes for us in our weakness, but as we practice these disciplines, we move from being “victims” of our weakness to being “more than conquerors.”

The practical “how-to” side of sanctification bridges the gap between the high theology of John 17 and your daily experience.

Staying in God’s presence is not merely a psychological state of mind; it is the lived reality of Jesus’ petition in John 17. In this prayer, Jesus acts as the “Bridge” that allows a human being to dwell in the presence of a holy God.

To understand how “staying in His presence” relates to this prayer, we have to look at three specific themes Jesus emphasizes: Union, Protection, and Truth.

Scriptural Thread: Section F

1. The Geometry of Presence: “In” as a Location

In John 17, Jesus uses the preposition “in” repeatedly. He prays that the believers may be “in us” (v. 21).

  • The Relationship: Staying in God’s presence fulfills Christ’s request for Organic Union.
  • The Connection: Just as the Spirit intercedes within us (Romans 8:26), Jesus prays that we would be positioned “inside” the Trinitarian relationship. To “stay in His presence” is to remain aware of this position—that you are “hidden with Christ in God” (Colossians 3:3).

2. Sanctification by Truth (The “Atmosphere” of Presence)

Jesus prays, “Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth” (John 17:17).

  • The Logic: You cannot stay in God’s presence while entertaining lies or “the world’s” logic. Presence and Truth are inseparable.
  • The Practice: Staying in His presence involves a “washing of regeneration” (Titus 3:5), in which the Word constantly cleanses your perspective. If you are out of alignment with the Truth, you will feel “distant” from the Presence, even though Christ’s prayer ensures you are never truly abandoned.

3. Protection from the “Evil One.”

Jesus specifically asks the Father not to take us out of the world, but to “keep them from the evil one” (John 17:15).

  • The Correlation: Staying in God’s presence is our primary “defence system.” In the High Priestly view, the “Presence” is a place of safety.
  • The Intercessory Link: This connects directly to Romans 8:28. The Spirit works all things for good by keeping us within the “High Priestly perimeter” Jesus prayed for. When we wander from a conscious awareness of God (leaving His “presence” in our minds), we become vulnerable to the “schemes” Jesus prayed against.

4. The Goal: Beholding Glory

The climax of John 17 is verse 24: “Father, I desire that they also, whom you have given me, may be with me where I am, to see my glory.”

  • The Definition of Presence: Ultimately, “staying in God’s presence” is the practice of Beholding.
  • The Result: As we behold His glory (through prayer, the Word, and the Spirit’s filling), we are transformed into that same image. This is the goal of sanctification.

Summary: The Intercessory “Pincer”

Staying in God’s presence is the active human response to the passive divine protection Jesus prayed for.

Jesus Prays (John 17) Our Response (Staying in Presence)
“Keep them in your name.” Trusting in God’s character and authority.
“That they may be one.” Maintaining the “unity of the Spirit” in the Body.
“Sanctify them in truth.” Renewing the mind and rejecting the world’s lies.
“That they may see my glory.” Consciously fixing our gaze on Christ throughout the day.

In essence, you don’t “create” God’s presence; you enter the presence that Jesus already demanded for you in John 17. The Spirit (Romans 8) then acts as the “inner witness” that confirms you are exactly where Jesus prayed you would be.

We need to see “presence” as a legal and spiritual reality secured by Christ, rather than just an emotional feeling.

The Holy Spirit’s serious warnings in Heb. 2:4; 2:11; 6:4-8; and 6:11, quoting the relevant texts, aim to earnestly maintain sanctification and eternal security, stay in unity with Christ’s Spirit, and be cautious not to destroy the legal and spiritual reality secured by Christ.

The Book of Hebrews presents a unique “tension” in the New Testament: it holds the absolute sufficiency of Christ’s sacrifice alongside the most urgent warnings in Scripture. These warnings are not meant to undermine the “legal reality” of Christ’s work, but to protect the “spiritual reality” of the believer’s participation in it.

Scriptural Thread: Section G

The Holy Bible (ESV) provides the following framework for this earnest maintenance of sanctification:

1. The Warning Against Drifting (Hebrews 2:1–4)

“Therefore, we must pay much closer attention to what we have heard, lest we drift away from it… while God also bore witness by signs and wonders and various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed according to his will.” (Heb. 2:1, 4)

  • The Definition: Sanctification is compared to a ship at anchor. To “stay in unity” with Christ’s Spirit requires active attention. The “signs and wonders” of the Holy Spirit are mentioned here as evidence that the message is too weighty to be ignored.
  • The Caution: Drifting is subtle. It is not necessarily an overt rebellion, but a gradual loss of focus on the “poured-out” Spirit (Titus 3:6). To maintain eternal security, one must “pay closer attention” to the Gospel’s anchor.

2. The Necessity of Shared Nature (Hebrews 2:11)

“For he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified all have one source. That is why he is not ashamed to call them brothers.”

  • The Definition: This defines the “legal and spiritual reality.” Christ is the Sanctifier; we are the sanctified. Staying in unity with Christ means recognizing our “one source” (the Father, through the Spirit).
  • The Practicality: Our security is found in our Brotherhood with Christ. If we deny the sanctification process, we are essentially denying the “source” that makes us family.

3. The Warning of Spiritual “Toxicity” (Hebrews 6:4–8)

“For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and shared in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God… and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance… For land that has drunk the rain… and bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed.” (Heb. 6:4-8)

  • The Definition: This is the most serious warning regarding the Holy Spirit. It describes people who have “shared” (metochous) in the Spirit—meaning they have experienced the “filling” and the “washing” we discussed.
  • The Caution: The “land” (the believer’s life) receives the “rain” (the Spirit’s influence). If that land consistently produces “thorns” (the works of the flesh) instead of “fruit” (the Fruit of the Spirit), it risks being “worthless” (adokimos—disqualified).
  • Maintaining Security: This text suggests that “staying in unity” involves a life that yields to the Spirit’s rain. True security is evidenced by the “crop” (sanctification) that the land produces.

4. The Antidote: Earnestness to the End (Hebrews 6:11)

“And we desire each one of you to show the same earnestness to have the full assurance of hope until the end.”

  • The Definition: “Full assurance” (Eternal Security) is linked to “earnestness” (Sanctification).
  • The Connection: Paul and the author of Hebrews both see assurance not as a “checked box” from the past, but as a current, vibrant reality maintained by the Spirit’s intercession (Romans 8).
  • The Goal: To “stay in unity” is to maintain the same “earnestness” for the things of God that we had when we were first “washed.”

Summary: How to Be Cautious

The Holy Spirit uses these warnings in Hebrews as “protective guardrails” for our faith.

  1. Legally: Christ has secured the reality. He is our High Priest (John 17).
  2. Spiritually: We must “pay attention” so that we do not “quench” or “grieve” the Spirit who applies that legal reality to our hearts.
  3. Practically: Sanctification is the evidence of our security. We stay in unity with Christ’s Spirit by bearing the fruit that comes from the “rain” of His presence, ensuring that our “land” is productive for the Kingdom.

In view of these warnings, the “washing of regeneration” (Titus 3:5) isn’t just a past event, but the foundation for an “earnestness” that lasts until the end. Hebrews acts as a catalyst for deeper sanctification rather than a threat to Christ’s finished work.

Scriptural Thread: Section H

The Annointing of the Spirit

The Holy Spirit’s anointing bears internal witness to believers, helping them remain abiding in Christ. Let’s assess the scriptures and texts of 1 John 2:20, 27; 1 John 5:6-7; and 1 John 5:10 to help us move beyond Christian nominalism and avoid false teaching.

In the Johannine epistles, the “anointing” (Greek: chrisma) refers to the Holy Spirit’s presence within the believer, acting as a spiritual immune system. This anointing is the primary safeguard against nominalism—the state of being a Christian in name only—and the seductive pull of false teaching.

Here is how the Holy Spirit’s internal witness functions to keep the believer abiding in Christ:

1. The Anointing as the “Giver of Discernment.”

“But you have been anointed by the Holy One, and you all have knowledge… But the anointing that you received from him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone should teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about everything, and is true, and is no lie—just as it has taught you, abide in him.” (1 John 2:20, 27) 

  • Saving from Nominalism: Nominalism thrives on a “second-hand” faith—believing things just because a leader says so. The Spirit’s anointing creates a first-hand knowledge. It moves the believer from mere intellectual “consent” to a vital “abiding” relationship.
  • Avoiding False Teaching: False teachers often claim “secret” or “higher” knowledge. John argues that because the Holy Spirit (the Spirit of Truth) lives in the believer, the believer has an internal “compass” that recognizes the voice of the True Shepherd and rejects the “lie.”

2. The Spirit as the Objective Witness

“This is he who came by water and blood—Jesus Christ; not by the water only but by the water and the blood. And the Spirit is the one who testifies, because the Spirit is the truth. For there are three that testify: the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree.” (1 John 5:6-7)

  • The Content of the Witness: The Spirit witnesses to the full reality of Christ: His baptism (water) and His sacrificial death (blood).
  • The Defence: False teachings often try to separate Jesus from the Christ (denying His humanity or His deity). The Spirit’s internal witness grounds the believer in the historical and spiritual reality of the Cross. This prevents the “drifting” warned about in Hebrews by anchoring the soul in the “blood and water” of Christ’s finished work.

3. The Internal Testimony and Eternal Security

“Whoever believes in the Son of God has the testimony in himself. Whoever does not believe God has made him a liar, because he has not believed in the testimony that God has borne concerning his Son.” (1 John 5:10)

  • The Personal Reality: The testimony isn’t just in a book; it is “in himself.” This is the internal resonance of the Spirit of God with the human spirit.
  • Combatting Nominalism: A nominal Christian lacks this internal testimony; they have the “form” of godliness but lack the “power” (the Resident Witness).
  • Maintaining Security: The Spirit’s witness provides the “full assurance of hope” mentioned in Hebrews 6:11. When a believer is tempted to doubt or follow a new “truth,” the internal anointing “bears witness” to the original Gospel, keeping them bound to the High Priestly intercession of Christ.

Summary: The Mechanics of Abiding

The anointing is the active presence of the Holy Spirit applying the “washing of regeneration” (Titus 3) to the believer’s daily life.

Feature of the Anointing Benefit to the Believer Protection Offered
It Abides (2:27) Constant communion with Christ. Prevents “Drifting” (Hebrews 2:1).
It Teaches (2:27) Internal recognition of the Truth. Exposes “False Teaching.”
It Testifies (5:6) Confirms the finished work of Jesus. Destroys “Nominalism.”
It is Internal (5:10) Certainty that we are God’s children. Provides “Full Assurance.”

Conclusion

By relying on the Holy Spirit’s anointing, the believer is not dependent on shifting cultural trends or persuasive “new” doctrines. Instead, they are held by the Internal Witness who agrees with the Word of God. This creates a life of “earnestness” (Hebrews 6:11) in which the believer remains united with Christ’s Spirit, ensuring that the legal reality secured at the Cross remains a vibrant, spiritual reality in their daily walk.

Scriptural Thread: Section I

Heretofore, we will study the use of the word Spirit with regard to visions and inspiration, and protection from evil in 1 John 3:9, 5:18; 1 Pet 1:23; Rev 1:10; 4:2; 12:13; 17:3; and 21:10. Also, we’ll look at the “seven spirits of God” in Rev 1:4; 3:5; 5:6; and Isa 11:2-3.

In the final books of the New Testament and the prophecy of Isaiah, the “Spirit” is presented as the bridge between the physical and spiritual realms—providing the vision to see heaven’s reality, the power to prevent the “seed” of sin from taking root, and the protection from the schemes of the dragon.

1. Vision and Inspiration: Being “In the Spirit.”

In Revelation, John uses the phrase “in the Spirit” to describe a state of divine transport or heightened prophetic inspiration. This is not a loss of consciousness, but an expansion of it to perceive higher realities.

  • Revelation 1:10; 4:2: John is “in the Spirit” on the Lord’s day. This is the entry point for divine Inspiration. The Spirit serves as the lens through which John sees the throne of God.
  • Revelation 17:3; 21:10: The Spirit carries John away to different vantage points—a wilderness to see the harlot and a great high mountain to see the New Jerusalem.
  • The Definition: Here, “Spirit” refers to the Holy Spirit as the Prophetic Agent. He is the one who lifts the human mind above the “earth-bound” perspective to see history from God’s point of view.

2. Protection and the “Seed”: Imperishable Life

In 1 John and 1 Peter, the Spirit’s work is focused on the internal protection of the believer’s nature. This is the “spiritual reality” of the new birth.

  • 1 John 3:9 & 5:18: “No one born of God makes a practice of sinning, for God’s seed abides in him.” Verse 5:18 adds that the “Evil One does not touch him.”
  • 1 Peter 1:23: We are born again through “imperishable seed,” which is the living and abiding word of God.
  • The Definition: The “Spirit” here is the life-giver who implants the “seed” (sperma) of God. Because this seed is the Holy Spirit’s own nature, it is incompatible with the “practice of sin.” The protection mentioned here is an Ontological Protection: the devil cannot “touch” (grasp or claim) the believer because the Spirit’s nature is an impenetrable barrier.

3. The Seven Spirits of God: The Fullness of Sight

The “Seven Spirits” in Revelation (1:4, 3:1, 4:5, 5:6) and Isaiah 11:2–3 refer to the perfect fullness of the Holy Spirit (seven being the number of completion).

  • Isaiah 11:2–3: This passage defines the “sevenfold” nature of the Spirit that rests on the Messiah:
    1. The Spirit of the Lord
    2. Spirit of Wisdom
    3. Spirit of Understanding
    4. Spirit of Counsel
    5. Spirit of Might
    6. Spirit of Knowledge
    7. Spirit of Fear of the Lord
  • Revelation 5:6: These “seven spirits” are described as the seven eyes of the Lamb, sent out into all the earth.
  • The Definition: This relates to Protection and Vision. Christ, as our High Priest, sees perfectly through the Spirit. There is no corner of the earth or the human heart hidden from His gaze. This “fullness” ensures that His intercession (Romans 8) and His protection of the “seed” are based on perfect, omniscient knowledge.

4. Protection in the Cosmic Conflict

Revelation 12:13 describes the dragon’s pursuit of “the woman.” While “Spirit” is not explicitly mentioned in that verse, the context of the surrounding chapters shows that it is the Spirit-inspired “witness” and the “eagle’s wings” (often a symbol of divine Spirit-led help) that enable the remnant to survive.

Synthesis: The Spirit as the Divine Perimeter

Connecting these texts reveals a comprehensive view of the Spirit’s role in the believer’s life:

Concept Scripture The Spirit’s Role
New Nature 1 John 3:9 / 1 Pet 1:23 Implants “Imperishable Seed” that cannot be corrupted.
Divine Vision Rev 1:10 / 21:10 Lifts the believer into the “Heavenly Perspective.”
Active Guard 1 John 5:18 Prevents the Evil One from “touching” the inner man.
Perfect Fullness Isa 11:2 / Rev 5:6 Provides Christ with perfect wisdom and sight for our defence.

Conclusion

The Spirit is not just a “force,” but the Atmosphere of the Kingdom. To be “in the Spirit” is to be in a place where visions are clear, the “seed” of God is protected, and the “Seven Spirits” provide the wisdom and might necessary to overcome Christian nominalism and the deceptions of the enemy.

From the Intercession of Romans 8 and John 17, through the Washing of Titus 3, to the Anointing of 1 John and the Prophetic Visions of Revelation. The Spirit is the one who secures the believer from the first moment of regeneration to the final vision of glory.

Scriptural Thread: Section J

1. The Spirit as Jesus’ Successor (The Paraclete)

The term Paraclete (Paraklētos) suggests one called alongside to act as a legal advocate or helper.

Here we assess how the Spirit is Jesus’ successor, in John 14:26; 15:26; and how the Spirit empowers the church’s mission and witness, proclamation of Jesus’ resurrection and triumph over Satan, demons, sickness and even death; as well as list the names of the Spirit, such as Advocate, Helper, Presence, Prophet, Paracletes, third person of the Trinity, Mission Prophetic in visions and dreams, Philip’s Guide with regard to the Ethiopian, Revelator, High Priestly Unifier etc. using scripture with texts, whereby the Spirit is presented as associated with God and in his Sovereign rule over the the world and church.

In the Gospel of John and the book of Acts, the Holy Spirit is not merely an “influence,” but the personal successor to Jesus’ earthly ministry. As Jesus ascended to the Father, He did not leave His followers as orphans; He sent “Another” (Allos) of the same kind to carry out His sovereign rule over the world and the church.

  • John 14:26: “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.” * The Succession: The Spirit succeeds Jesus by continuing the role of Teacher. He does not bring a new message, but illuminates the words of Jesus.
  • John 15:26: “But when the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me.”
    • The Mission: The Spirit’s primary role as successor is to be the Chief Witness to the person of Christ.

2. Empowerment for Mission and Witness

The Spirit empowers the Church to demonstrate Christ’s triumph over the powers of darkness. This is the “Mission Prophetic” in action.

  • Proclamation of Resurrection: In Acts 2:32-33, Peter declares that the risen Jesus has “poured out” the Spirit. The existence of the Spirit’s power is the empirical proof that Jesus is alive and enthroned.
  • Triumph over Satan and Demons: In Acts 13:9-11, Paul, “filled with the Holy Spirit,” rebukes Elymas the sorcerer, demonstrating the Spirit’s authority over demonic deception.
  • Victory over Sickness and Death: * Acts 3:6-8: The Spirit empowers the healing of the lame man “in the name of Jesus.”
    • Acts 9:40: The Spirit empowers Peter to raise Tabitha from the dead, proving that the Spirit of the Resurrection (Romans 8:11) is active in the Church.

3. The Divine Names and Roles of the Spirit

The New Testament provides various titles that describe the Spirit’s multifaceted work within the Trinity and the world:

Name / Title Biblical Reference Role & Function
Advocate / Helper John 14:16; 16:7 Legal counsel who defends the believer and convicts the world.
The Spirit of Truth John 16:13 The Revelator who guides the Church into all truth.
The Presence Psalm 139:7; Rom 8:9 The immediate, personal presence of God with the believer.
Philip’s Guide Acts 8:26-39 The sovereign director of individual missionary encounters (The Ethiopian Eunuch).
Mission Prophetic Acts 2:17-18 The source of visions and dreams for the “last days” mission.
High Priestly Unifier Ephesians 4:3 The “bond of peace” who maintains the unity Jesus prayed for in John 17.
Third Person of the Trinity Matt 28:19 Co-equal with the Father and Son in the baptismal formula and rule.
Spirit of the Sovereign Lord Isaiah 61:1 The one who anoints for the proclamation of liberty and justice.

4. Sovereign Rule Over World and Church

The Spirit is presented as the executive of God’s sovereign rule. He is not passive; He actively governs.

  • Sovereign Governance in the Church: In Acts 15:28, the Jerusalem Council concludes, “For it has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us…” The Spirit is the Senior Partner in church government.
  • Sovereign Rule over the World: In John 16:8-11, the Spirit acts as a global prosecutor, “convicting the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment.” He reveals that the “ruler of this world” (Satan) stands judged.

Conclusion: The Unified Reality

By combining these texts, we see that the Spirit is the High Priestly Unifier who connects the heavenly intercession of Christ with the earthly mission of the Church. He is the Revelator who ensures the Church does not fall into nominalism, the Prophet who directs expansion (like with Philip), and the Sovereign who ensures that Christ’s triumph over death and the demonic is not just a past event, but a present, manifested reality.

Scriptural Thread: Section K

The Holy Spirit’s Sovereign Scope

This study encapsulates the Holy Spirit not as a vague force, but as the personal, sovereign Executive of the Godhead, active from the dawn of creation to the final illumination of the human heart.

1. The Deity and Personhood of the Holy Spirit

The Spirit is a Person, possessing intellect, emotion, and will, and is fully God, coequal and coeternal with the Father and the Son.

  • Attributes of Personhood: He can be grieved (Eph 4:30), resisted (Acts 7:51), and He speaks and commands (Acts 13:2).
  • Absolute Deity: In Acts 5:3–4, Peter explicitly equates lying to the Holy Spirit with lying to God. He possesses divine attributes: Omniscience (1 Cor 2:10–11) and Omnipresence (Ps 139:7).

The work of the Holy Spirit with scriptures and texts, notably presenting The Deity & Personhood of the Holy Spirit; The Holy Spirit & the Trinity (Procession); The Holy Spirit & Creation & Providence; The Holy Spirit & Inspiration, Inerrancy, and Illumination; The Holy Spirit & Angels; The Holy Spirit & Human Beings & Sin (regarding Conviction, Blasphemy).

2. The Holy Spirit and the Trinity (Procession)

Theologically known as Spiration, the Spirit’s relationship within the Trinity is defined by His “procession.”

  • The Text: In John 15:26, Jesus speaks of the “Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father.”
  • The Mission: He is sent by both the Father (John 14:26) and the Son (John 16:7). He is the “Bond of Love” between the Father and the Son, ensuring the unity Jesus prayed for in John 17.

3. The Holy Spirit in Creation and Providence

The Spirit is the “Life-Giver” who sustains and orders the physical universe.

  • Creation: In Genesis 1:2, the Spirit was “hovering over the face of the waters,” bringing order to chaos. Psalm 104:30 declares, “When you send forth your Spirit, they are created.”
  • Providence: He is the “Presence” that prevents the world from collapsing into non-existence, acting as the sovereign hand of God in the preservation of life.

4. Inspiration, Inerrancy, and Illumination

The Spirit is the divine Author of Scripture and the only one who can unlock its meaning for the believer.

  • Inspiration & Inerrancy: 2 Peter 1:21 states that “men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.” Because the Spirit is the “Spirit of Truth” (John 16:13), the resulting Word is inherently without error (Inerrant).
  • Illumination: While the Spirit inspired the text, He must also provide illumination for the reader to understand it. 1 Corinthians 2:14 notes that the natural person cannot discern spiritual things because they are “spiritually discerned.”

5. The Holy Spirit and Angels

The Spirit’s relationship to the angelic realm is one of sovereign authority and shared mission.

  • The Command: The Spirit directs the activity of God’s messengers. In the visions of Ezekiel 1, the “spirit” (the Spirit of God) directed the movement of the living creatures (cherubim).
  • The Witness: Both the Spirit and the angels are witnesses to the work of Christ (1 Tim 3:16).

6. Human Beings and Sin (Conviction & Blasphemy)

The Spirit’s primary “outward” work toward humanity involves managing sin and issuing a call to repentance.

  • Conviction: John 16:8 states that the Spirit will “convict the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment.” This is the “High Priestly” prosecution that prepares the heart for the “washing of regeneration” (Titus 3:5).
  • Blasphemy against the Spirit: In Matthew 12:31–32, Jesus warns that blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. This is defined as the persistent, decisive rejection of the Spirit’s witness to Christ—attributing the Spirit’s work to Satan and effectively sealing oneself off from the only agent capable of bringing repentance.

Summary Table: The Holy Spirit’s Sovereign Scope

Domain Key Action Scripture
The Godhead Proceeding from Father & Son John 15:26
The Universe Ordering and Sustaining Gen 1:2; Ps 104:30
The Word Breathing (Inspiration) 2 Pet 1:21; 2 Tim 3:16
The Soul Convicting and Regenerating John 16:8; Titus 3:5
The Church Governing and Unifying Acts 15:28; Eph 4:3

Scriptural Thread: Section L

The Eternal Guidance of the Holy Spirit

Here we study all aspects of Guidance by the Holy Spirit using scriptures nd texts, in the Old and New Testaments

Guidance by the Holy Spirit is the sovereign act of God directing his people toward his specific purposes. In the Old Testament, this was often external and national; in the New Testament, it becomes internal, personal, and constant.

1. The Mode of External Guidance (Old Testament)

In the Old Testament, the Spirit guided primarily through physical signs and anointed leaders to preserve the covenant people.

  • The Pillar of Cloud and Fire: While often attributed to the “Angel of the Lord,” Nehemiah 9:20 clarifies the Spirit’s role: “You gave your good Spirit to instruct them and did not withhold your manna from their mouth.”
  • The Shepherd of the People: Isaiah 63:14 describes the Exodus journey: “Like livestock that go down into the valley, the Spirit of the Lord gave them rest. So you led your people, to make for yourself a glorious name.”
  • Skill and Wisdom: Guidance was also vocational. The Spirit guided Bezalel (Exodus 31:3) by filling him with “wisdom and understanding” to construct the Tabernacle according to the heavenly pattern.

2. The Mode of Internal Guidance (New Testament)

With the indwelling of the Spirit, guidance shifts from the “Pillar of Fire” to the “Spirit of Truth” residing within the believer.

  • The Spirit of Truth: John 16:13 is the foundational text: “When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth… and he will declare to you the things that are to come.” This is the “Successor” role, where the Spirit applies the teachings of Jesus to new situations.
  • The Internal Witness: Romans 8:14 defines the mark of a believer: “For all who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God.” This guidance is an ongoing, habitual “walking” (Galatians 5:16) rather than a one-time event.
  • The “No” of the Spirit: Guidance is often prohibitive. In Acts 16:6–7, Paul and his companions were “forbidden by the Holy Spirit to speak the word in Asia” and the “Spirit of Jesus did not allow them” to enter Bithynia. This is sovereign redirection.

3. The Methods of Spirit-Led Guidance

The Bible outlines specific “channels” through which this guidance is communicated:

Method Scripture Description
Through the Word Psalm 119:105 The Spirit “illuminates” the text to provide a “lamp to the feet.”
Through Direct Speech Acts 13:2 During worship/fasting, the Spirit said: “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul.”
Through Circumstance Acts 8:26-29 The Spirit prompted Philip to go to a specific chariot at a specific time.
Through Visions Acts 10:19 “While Peter was pondering the vision, the Spirit said to him, ‘Behold, three men are looking for you.'”
Through Peace Colossians 3:15 The “peace of Christ” (mediated by the Spirit) acts as an “umpire” in the heart.

4. Guidance as “The Anointing” (1 John 2)

As discussed previously, the Anointing (1 John 2:27) serves as a safeguard. This specific type of guidance is Epistemological Guidance—it guides the believer in distinguishing between what is true and what is false.

  • It protects from nominalism by making the truth “live” in the heart.
  • It protects against heresy by providing “resonance” with the Gospel and “dissonance” with false teaching.

5. The Goal of Guidance: The High Priestly Union

The Holy Spirit never guides a person toward chaos or isolation. Because the Spirit is the High Priestly Unifier, His guidance always leads toward:

  1. Christ-Likeness: Replicating the “Fruit of the Spirit” (Galatians 5:22).
  2. Unity in the Body: Directing believers to “submit to one another” (Ephesians 5:21).
  3. The Mission of God: Directing the “Mission Prophetic” to reach the lost, as seen in the life of Philip and the Ethiopian (Acts 8).

Summary

Guidance by the Holy Spirit is the application of God’s Sovereign Rule to the individual’s life. In the Old Testament, it was the “Map” (The Law/The Pillar); in the New Testament, it is the “Guide” (The Paraclete). Whether through the “imperishable seed” of the Word or the “visions and dreams” of the prophetic mission, the Spirit ensures the believer remains in the “will of God” (Romans 8:27).

Scriptural Thread: Section M

1. The Transformation: From Perishable to Spiritual

This section of scripture looks at all aspects of being glorified in the Holy Spirit at death, having spiritual bodies, using scriptures and texts,1 Cor 15:42-44, 46; Phil 3:20-21; Rom 8:11,23; Rom 12:1; 8:23; 2 Cor 5:1-4; 1 John 3:2

The transition from this “body of death” to a glorified state represents the final stage of sanctification. This is the moment when the internal work of the Spirit (Regeneration) finally consumes the external vessel, resulting in a spiritual body (somapneumatikon) perfectly suited for eternal communion with God.

Paul defines the mechanics of this glorification by contrasting our current biology with our future reality.

  • 1 Corinthians 15:42-44, 46: “What is sown is perishable; what is raised is imperishable… It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body.” * The Definition: A “spiritual body” is not a ghost-like, non-material entity. Rather, it is a body fully animated and dominated by the Pneuma (Holy Spirit) rather than the Psyche (natural soul). It is a physical body no longer subject to the decay of the “fall.”
  • Philippians 3:20-21: Paul notes that Jesus will “transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body.” Our glorification is a participation in the Resurrection of Christ, the “Firstfruits.”

2. The Spirit as the Agent of Resurrection

The Holy Spirit is the “Life-Giver” who bridges the gap between death and glory.

  • Romans 8:11: “If the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit who dwells in you.”
    • The Legal/Spiritual Link: The same Spirit that “washes” us (Titus 3:5) and “intercedes” for us (Romans 8:26) is the one who holds the blueprint for our glorified form.
  • Romans 8:23: We groan inwardly as we wait for the “redemption of our bodies.” Glorification is the final payment on the “guarantee” (earnest money) of the Spirit.

3. The Intermediate State and the “Heavenly Dwelling.”

Between death and the final resurrection, the believer experiences a transition described as moving from a “tent” to a “building.”

  • 2 Corinthians 5:1-4: “For we know that if the tent that is our earthly home is destroyed, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens… so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life.”
    • The Caution: Paul desires not to be “unclothed” (a disembodied spirit) but to be “further clothed.” Glorification is the ultimate “clothing” of the human person in the glory of the Spirit.

4. The Beatific Vision: Seeing and Becoming

The final trigger for glorification is the sight of the Lord Himself, facilitated by the Spirit’s revelation.

  • 1 John 3:2: “Beloved, we are God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is.”
    • The Logic: In the presence of Christ, the Spirit-filled believer undergoes a final, instantaneous transformation. The “image of the Son” that the Spirit has been forming in us (Romans 8:29) becomes a physical and spiritual reality.

5. Present Preparation for Future Glory

Even though glorification happens at the “end,” the New Testament links our current physical life to that future state.

  • Romans 12:1: “Present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God.”
    • The Connection: Because our bodies are destined for the Spirit’s glorification, they are not disposable. They are “Temples of the Holy Spirit” (1 Cor 6:19). Sanctification today is the “rehearsal” for the glory of tomorrow.

Summary: The Final State

Glorification is the total sovereignty of the Holy Spirit over the human person.

Aspect Current State (Natural Body) Glorified State (Spiritual Body)
Source of Life Biological / Soul (Psyche) The Holy Spirit (Pneuma)
Durability Perishable / Weak Imperishable / Powerful
Relationship to Sin Presence of Sin remains Total absence of Sin
Visibility Masked by the flesh Radiating the Glory of Christ

In this state, the High Priestly Prayer (John 17) is fully answered: we are “one” with the Trinity, we see His glory, and the “love with which the Father loved the Son” becomes the very atmosphere we breathe in our new, spiritual bodies.

Scriptural Thread: Section N

1. The Covenantal Blueprint: From Stone to Heart

The guidance of holiness in the Holy Spirit represents a deep transformation—an internal realignment of the human will with the Divine Will. This is not a passive state but a high-stakes, collaborative pursuit that moves from the heart of the individual to the household, and ultimately to the cosmic mission of the Church. Sanctification is the fulfillment of God’s ancient divine plan to dwell among a specific people.

  • The Foundation: God remembers His covenant (Ex 2:24) and establishes a place of worship (Josh 8:30–35). The physical Temple built by Solomon (1 Kings 6:22–24) and the Davidic promise (2 Sam 7:13–14) were “blueprints” for a greater spiritual reality.
  • The Transformation: The prophets envisioned a shift from external law to internal nature. Ezekiel 11:17–20 and Jeremiah 31:31–34 describe a “new heart” and a “new spirit.” This is the core of the New Covenant: the Law is no longer a checklist but a heart-inclination provided by the Spirit.

2. Christ as the Executive Model of Sanctification

Jesus did not just teach holiness; He embodied it as the “Kingdom Temple.”

  • The Pattern (Matt 5:3–11, 20): The Beatitudes are the internal “character profile” of the sanctified heart. True righteousness must exceed that of the scribes—moving from outward ritual to inward purity.
  • The True Temple (John 2:18–21, 4:19–23): Jesus identifies His own body as the Temple. In the New Covenant, worship is no longer about “where” (Gerizim or Jerusalem) but “how”—in Spirit and Truth.
  • The Cleansing (John 13:1–20, 15:1–10): Through the foot-washing, Jesus demonstrates that sanctification involves perpetual cleansing and “abiding.” We are “clean” because of His word, but we must stay connected to the Vine to remain fruitful.

3. The Power Source: Pentecost and the Newness of Life

Holiness is impossible without the “Successor” (the Spirit) poured out in the “Last Days.”

  • The Outpouring (Acts 2 / Joel 2): Pentecost was the executive launch of the Mission Prophetic. The Spirit empowers all believers to prophesy, see visions, and witness.
  • The Vital Union (Rom 6:4, 12–13): Sanctification begins by being united with Christ in His death and resurrection. We “walk in newness of life,” meaning we consider ourselves “dead to sin” but “alive to God.”
  • The Spirit of Life (Rom 8:2, 4, 9–17): The “Law of the Spirit of life” sets us free from the law of sin and death. This “walk” is an active, daily dependency on the Spirit who confirms our sonship and intercedes for our weaknesses.

4. The Practice of Holiness: Community, Marriage, and Family

Sanctification is never a solitary pursuit; it is a communal discipline.

  • The Corporate Temple (1 Cor 3:1–3, 6:11): Paul rebukes carnal behaviour because the community is the temple. We were “washed, sanctified, and justified” to live in harmony, not strife.
  • Domestic Sanctification (1 Thess 4:2–8; 1 Pet 3:1, 16): Holiness is lived out in the most intimate spaces—marriage and family. Sexual purity and the “gentle and quiet spirit” within the home are the primary evidence of a transformed heart.
  • Discipline and Suffering (1 Pet 2:22–25; Heb 12:1–2): Like Christ, the believer learns obedience through suffering. We “run the race” by looking to Jesus, the Author and Finisher of our faith, accepting the Father’s discipline as proof of our legitimacy as heirs.

5. The Mission: A Sanctified People Sent

The ultimate goal of a sanctified heart is effective mission.

  • Commissioned (John 17:17–19): Jesus prays, “Sanctify them in the truth… as you sent me into the world, so I have sent them.” Our holiness is the “credential” for our message.
  • Virtue and Growth (2 Pet 1:3–11): We are called to “supplement our faith” with virtue, knowledge, and self-control. If these qualities are ours, we will be neither “ineffective nor unfruitful.”
  • The Final Guard (Jude 20–25): We build ourselves up in the “most holy faith,” praying in the Holy Spirit, while God—the Sovereign Executive—is able to keep us from stumbling and present us blameless before His glory.

Summary: The Executive Flow of Holiness

Stage Key Scripture Focus
Foundation Ezek 11:19; Heb 9:15 The New Heart and the Eternal Inheritance.
Identification Rom 6:4; Gal 3:3 Death to self; life in the Spirit.
Regulation 1 Thess 4:3; 1 Pet 1:15 Living out “Leviticus holiness” in a modern world.
Implementation John 17:18; 2 Pet 1:8 Mission-oriented fruitfulness.

Deeply Divine Definition: Guidance in holiness is the Holy Spirit’s sovereign management of the believer’s life, transitioning them from a “natural” state of sin (Rom 3:23) to a “spiritual” state of glory (Heb 12). This transformation is validated in the community, tested in the family, and manifested in a world-changing mission to proclaim the triumph of the Risen Christ.

1 D.A. Carson, Andreas Kostenberger;  Biblical Theology of the Holy Spirit, 

Sourced ESV Scriptural Studies included:

The guidance of holiness in the Holy Spirit in a sanctified, transformed heart, using these expressed ideas: Practice of sanctification is not just an individual solitary pursuit, it is pursued in community, lived out in marriage and family, resulting in effective mission, with scripture with texts in Ex 2:24; Josh 8:30-35; 2 Sam 7:13-14; 1 Kings 6:22-24; Ezek 11:17-20; Jer 31:31-34; Jesus as our model of sanctification in Matt 5:3-11, 20; and Jesus with his kingdom temple in John 2:18-21, 4:19-23; cleansing of the new covenant community in John 13:1-20; 15:1-10; and how we are a sanctified people commissioned to spread the gospel in John 17:17-19; the outpouring of the Spirit at Pentecost in the “last days” Acts 2 citing Joel 2; plus Sanctification, purification and transformation using texts in Gal 3:3; 1 Thess 4:2-8; 2 Thess 2:13-15; 1 Pet 3:16; 1 Cor 3:1-3, 6:11; United with Christ in his death, burial, and resurrection, believers walk in the newness of life Romans 3: 9, 23; 6:4, 12-13; Live – “walk” being transformed by the Spirit of life in Rom 8:2, 4, 9-11, 14-17; sanctified as per Heb 9:15, 10:20, Heb 11, Heb 12:1-2; 1 Peter 1:1. 17; 2:11 echoing Leviticus holiness teachings; Discipline & Suffering using 1 Pet 2:22-25, 3:1; Love and Virtue: 2 Tim 2:1-2, 6-8; Jude v 3, vv 20-22 and vv 24-25; 2 Pet 1:3-11, 8-11, 2:9. Practice of sanctification is not just an individual solitary pursuit, it is pursued in community, lived out in marriage and family, resulting in effective mission

Key Doctrinal Heresies of the SDA Church

As we seek to follow only the wisdom and enlightenment of our Lord, I want to note that we love Seventh-day Adventists (SDAs), and hereby ponder the Word of Christ by whom Truth alone is known: In John 17:19, Jesus states, “For their sakes I consecrate myself, that they also may be sanctified in truth.” Generally, SDAs individually love the Lord, worship Christ joyfully, and the majority do not understand the concept of Truth versus heresy because they are not trained in theology nor study their doctrines comparatively with the bible only. Many are influenced by the early pioneers of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, primarily Ellen G. White, and the General Conference leadership that continues to rely on her interpretations rather than reform. After reading this, check out how Groupthink influences our paradigm.

Seventh-day Adventism (SDA) holds several doctrines that are considered heretical by both Reformed and Orthodox Christian traditions. Truth made known by Christ’s Spirit offers us purification — Sanctification by His Truth – Scripture without compromise. All true doctrine is delineated and cross-referenced only by The Sharper and most Active Word of God. Praise be to Jesus Christ our Lord! Glory alone be to Him as we weigh the Truth.

Doctrinal Heresies of Seventh-day Adventism Rejected by Reformed and Orthodox Christianity

Seventh-day Adventism (SDA) holds several doctrines that are considered heretical by both Reformed and Orthodox Christian traditions. Many of these teachings are rooted in, or were confirmed by, the prophetic claims and writings of Ellen G. White, who is regarded within Adventism as having divinely inspired authority. 1 

Key Doctrinal Heresies

  1. Justification by Faith Plus Works (Denial of Sola Fide)
  • SDA teaches that salvation is not by faith alone but requires obedience to the law, particularly the Ten Commandments, for final justification. This is a hybrid system where one’s works play a role in determining ultimate salvation, which contradicts the Reformation doctrine of justification by faith alone (sola fide). 2 
  • Ellen G. White’s writings, especially in The Great Controversy, reinforce the necessity of perfect obedience and suggest that only those who demonstrate this will be saved. She also falsely stated that we must be able to perfectly obey God, in a sinless condition, able to stand in the Final Judgment without our Mediator 3 — Christ the Lord — who is our High Priest– continually intercedes on our behalf! (Romans 8:34, 27; Hebrews 7:25)
  1. Investigative Judgment
  • SDA uniquely teaches that since 1844, Christ has been conducting an “investigative judgment” in heaven, reviewing the lives of believers to determine their worthiness for salvation. This doctrine is absent from historic Christianity and is rejected as unbiblical by both Reformed and Orthodox traditions. 4 
  • Ellen G. White was instrumental in confirming and promoting this doctrine through her visions, which were used to settle doctrinal disputes among early Adventists. 5 
  1. The Nature and Person of Christ
  • Adventist theology has historically taught that Jesus is Michael the Archangel, a created being exalted to equality with God, and that Christ took on a fallen, sinful human nature and could have sinned (peccability). These views deviate from orthodox Christology, which affirms the eternal deity and impeccability of Christ. 6 
  • Ellen G. White’s writings have contributed to these views, especially the identification of Jesus with Michael the Archangel. 7 
  1. The Trinity
  • While contemporary SDA statements use the term “Trinity,” their understanding often diverges from the orthodox doctrine. Adventist teaching sometimes presents the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as three separate beings united in purpose rather than being one in essence, which is closer to Tritheism or Monarchianism than orthodox Trinitarianism. 8 
  • The Adventist view of the Holy Spirit as a conscious person developed only decades after the movement’s founding, partly under the influence of Ellen G. White. 9 
  1. Soul Sleep and Conditional Immortality
  • SDA teaches “soul sleep” (the dead are unconscious until the resurrection) and “conditional immortality” (the wicked are annihilated rather than eternally punished). Both views are rejected by Reformed and Orthodox Christianity, which affirm the conscious existence of the soul after death and the eternal punishment of the wicked. 10  
  1. Satan as the Scapegoat
  • Adventism teaches that Satan, not Christ, will ultimately bear the sins of the redeemed as the “scapegoat” (Azazel) in the final judgment. This contradicts the biblical teaching that Christ alone bore our sins. 11  
  1. Sabbath Observance as a Test of Salvation
  • SDA elevates Saturday Sabbath observance to a test of faith and a sign of the true church, implying that Sunday worship is a mark of apostasy. This is contrary to the New Testament teaching that regards Sabbath observance as a matter of Christian liberty. 12 

The Influence of Ellen G. White

Ellen G. White was the principal founder and prophetic authority of the Seventh-day Adventist movement. Her visions and writings were considered the final arbiter in doctrinal disputes and were used to confirm or correct the movement’s teachings when consensus could not be reached. And from this perspective, Ellen G. White, though long-deceased, has stood in the way of SDA reform through her perpetuating delusional influence; moreover her insistence that her views were advancing Scriptual understanding, like no other denomination was privy to. 13 Her book, The Great Controversy, is central to Adventist theology, shaping its unique doctrines, such as the investigative judgment, perfectionism, and the cosmic conflict between Christ and Satan. 14 

White’s influence is evident in the following ways:

  • She provided prophetic validation for doctrines not found in Scripture or historic Christianity, such as the investigative judgment and the role of Satan as scapegoat. 15
  • Her teachings on perfectionism and obedience to the law as necessary for salvation underpin the SDA rejection of justification by faith alone. 16 
  • Her identification of Jesus as Michael the Archangel and her evolving views on the Trinity influenced Adventist Christology and theology of God.17 

Summary Table

Doctrinal Issue SDA Teaching (with Ellen G. White’s Influence) Orthodox/Reformed Position
Justification Faith + works (perfectionism) Faith alone (sola fide)
Investigative Judgment Christ reviews believers since 1844 No such doctrine
Christology Jesus is Michael the Archangel, could have sinned Jesus is eternal God, impeccable
Trinity “Heavenly Trio,” sometimes tritheistic One God in three coequal persons
Soul Sleep/Annihilation Dead are unconscious; wicked are annihilated Conscious afterlife; eternal hell
Satan as Scapegoat Satan bears sins of the redeemed Christ alone bears our sins
Sabbath Observance Saturday is a test of faith Sabbath observance not salvific

Ellen G. White’s prophetic authority was the linchpin for these doctrinal developments, and her influence remains central to Adventist identity and theology. 18 These teachings are why Reformed and Orthodox Christianity reject Seventh-day Adventism as outside the bounds of historic Christian orthodoxy.

1 Answering Adventism

2 Ibid

3 Life Assurance Ministries

4 GotQuestions.org

5 Answering Adventism

6 Ibid

7 GotQuestions.org

8 Answering Adventism

9 Ibid

10  Grace Church (John MacArthur)

11  Ibid

12 GotQuestions.org

3 Answering Adventism

14 Life Assurance Ministries

15 Answering Adventism

16 Life Assurance Ministries

17 Answering Adventism

18 Ibid

Three Romans Chapters: 6, 7, and 8

St. Paul’s three chapters in Romans 6–8 emphasize the believer’s union with Christ, the tension between justification and ongoing sanctification, and the transformative power of grace. His analysis integrates forensic justification with the practical reality of spiritual warfare, culminating in the assurance of victory through the Spirit. Below is a verse-by-verse breakdown of his theological framework:

Romans 6: Death to Sin, Life in Christ

This chapter establishes believers’ definitive break with sin through their union with Christ’s death and resurrection. Key elements include:

  • Freedom from sin’s legal dominion: Justification frees believers from sin’s penalty and power. The text “he who has died has been freed from sin” (Rom 6:7) signifies that Christ’s death legally dissolves sin’s claim over the believer, rendering them no longer bound to its consequences.

  • Baptism as a symbolic union: Baptism represents the believer’s identification with Christ’s death (Rom 6:3–4), marking a transfer from Adam’s lineage to Christ’s new creation..

  • Ethical imperative: Freedom from sin is not license for indulgence but a call to “walk in newness of life” (Rom 6:4). Grace empowers obedience, rejecting the notion that justification permits licentiousness (Rom 6:15).

Romans 7: The Struggle with Indwelling Sin

This chapter as a spiritual autobiography of the believer’s tension between their justified status and the lingering presence of sin. Key insights:

  • The law’s role: While the law is holy (Rom 7:12), it exposes humanity’s incapacity to achieve righteousness through works. The “wretched man” (Rom 7:24) embodies the Christian’s struggle against the flesh, even after regeneration.

  • Dual service: Believers serve God’s law with their minds but battle the “law of sin” in their flesh (Rom 7:25). This paradox reflects the “simultaneously righteous and sinful” reality.

  • No condemnation in Christ: The chapter’s despair resolves in the doxology of Romans 7:25a—“Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ!”—pointing ahead to the assurance of Romans 8:17.

Romans 8: Victory Through the Spirit

This chapter is the climactic resolution of the preceding struggles, centered on the Spirit’s work:

  • No condemnation: The declaration “there is now no condemnation” (Romans 8:1) reaffirms justification’s security, grounding believers in Christ’s finished work rather than their fluctuating spiritual performance.

  • Spirit-led transformation: The Spirit empowers believers to fulfill the law’s righteous requirements (Romans 8:4), replacing the “mindset of the flesh” with life and peace (Romans 8:6).

  • Eschatological hope: The “groaning” of creation (Rom 8:22–23) and the Spirit’s intercession (Rom 8:26–27) assure believers of their future glorification and eternal security in God’s love (Rom 8:38–39).

Theological Synthesis

  • Justification and sanctification: Forensic justification (legal freedom from sin’s penalty) harmonizes with transformative sanctification (ongoing renewal by the Spirit). The believer’s identity in Christ (Rom 6:11) fuels ethical living.

  • Law and grace: The law’s condemnation (Rom 7:7–12) is answered by grace’s dominion (Rom 6:14), which enables obedience without legalism.

  • Union with Christ: The entire passage hinges on the believer’s incorporation into Christ’s death and resurrection, making sanctification a participation in His victory..

Romans chapters 6 to 8 reflect St. Paul’s broader emphasis on grace-driven reformation, where doctrinal truth fuels personal holiness and societal transformation.

Transformation in Romans 6, 7, and 8

Sanctification in Romans 6–8 centers on the inseparable link between justification and sanctification, the believer’s union with Christ, and the transformative work of the Holy Spirit. The author Paul emphasizes that sanctification is a definitive reality and an ongoing process, rooted in grace rather than human effort. Below is a synthesis of his approach:

1. Sanctification as a Definitive Break with Sin (Romans 6)

Sanctification begins with the believer’s union with Christ’s death and resurrection (Rom 6:3–5). This union severs the power of sin’s dominion:

  • Freedom from slavery to sin: Justification liberates believers from sin’s penalty, while sanctification breaks its ruling power. The declaration “we died to sin” (Rom 6:2) is not merely positional but establishes a new identity, enabling believers to “walk in newness of life” (cf. 2 Corinthians 5:14–15)

  • Ethical imperative: Sanctification is not optional; grace compels holiness. Paul refutes antinomianism by showing that salvation by grace necessitates a life of obedience (Rom 6:15–16). 1

  • Fourfold responsibility: Most commentators stress the believer’s role in sanctification: knowing their union with Christ, reckoning themselves dead to sin, yielding to God, and obeying His Word (Rom 6:11–19).

2. The Tension of Indwelling Sin (Romans 7)

Romans 7 is a portrayal of the Christian’s ongoing struggle with sin, even after justification:

  • The law’s role: The law exposes sin’s persistence in the flesh (Rom 7:7–12), highlighting the inadequacy of human effort. The “wretched man” (Rom 7:24) exemplifies the tension between the redeemed spirit and the lingering sinful nature as noted by D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones’ book “God the Holy Spirit,” published as Second Edition in 2002 with the first Edition in 1997. 2

  • Dependence on grace: Sanctification cannot be achieved through legalistic striving but through reliance on Christ’s finished work. The cry of despair in Rom 7:24 resolves in gratitude for deliverance through Jesus (Rom 7:25a), pointing to the Spirit’s victory in Romans 8. 3

3. Spirit-Empowered Transformation (Romans 8)

Romans 8 resolves the tension by emphasizing the Holy Spirit’s role in sanctification:

  • No condemnation: The believer’s standing in Christ (Rom 8:1) assures that sanctification flows from justification. The Spirit empowers obedience, fulfilling the law’s requirements (Rom 8:4). 4

  • Progressive renewal: The Spirit renews the mind (Rom 8:5–6), replacing a “fleshly mindset” with life and peace. This transformation is both individual and cosmic, as creation awaits final redemption (Rom 8:19–23).

  • Eschatological hope: The Spirit’s intercession (Rom 8:26–27) and God’s sovereign love (Rom 8:38–39) guarantee the believer’s perseverance, ensuring the completion of sanctification in glorification.

Key Themes in Romans Chapters 6-8

  • Union with Christ: Sanctification is grounded in participation in Christ’s death and resurrection, making holiness inseparable from gospel truth. This reveals the importance of studying true biblical doctrine and avoiding heresy.

  • Grace-driven effort: While sanctification requires active obedience, it is sustained by grace, not self-reliance. The imperative (“do not let sin reign”) flows from the indicative (“you are dead to sin”).

  • Integration of justification and sanctification: To separate them is to distort the gospel. Justification declares righteousness; Sanctification manifests it.

    1. When we believe in Christ, we do not give that glory to another, which is due only to God (Ps. 146:3-5). The confidence we place in the Redeemer is not alienated from God. Our justification is through faith in Christ, as Paul shows at great length in Romans. Yet, in the same epistle he sometimes speaks of that faith by which we are justified as if it were placed in God the Father: “If you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in your heart that God has raised him from the dead, you will be saved” (Rom. 10:9; 4:24). To believe in Christ as an exalted Saviour is to believe in God, who raised Him from the dead.
      • One thing is sure: our faith, if genuine, must be in exact accordance with the Word of the truth of the gospel. Hence, in Scripture, it is called obedience to the gospel or the “obedience of faith.”  As our study has indicated, faith in the Gospel of God means the Father calls us to His Son Jesus Christ to receive an inheritance of eternal salvation by the work of the Holy Spirit.
      • This exposition aligns with Reformed emphases on monergism and the Spirit’s transformative power, rejecting legalism and license. Monergerism underscores that sanctification is God’s work from start to finish, accomplished through the Word and Spirit and anchored in the believer’s union with Christ.

The Purpose of the Law in a Christian’s life

The perspective on the role of the Law in the believer’s life, as reflected in Romans 6–8, emphasizes its diagnostic purpose, its limitations in sanctification, and its fulfillment through union with Christ and the Spirit’s empowerment. Pauline theology, given to Paul by the revelation of the risen Jesus, integrates Reformed emphases on the Law’s holiness, its inability to justify or sanctify, and its enduring value in exposing sin and directing believers to grace.

1. The Law’s Diagnostic Role: Exposing Sin (Romans 7:7–12)

Paul’s assertion that the Law is “holy, righteous, and good” (Rom 7:12) reveals sin’s nature and human inability to meet God’s standards. Key points:

  • Mirror of sin: The Law acts as a spiritual mirror, exposing the “utter sinfulness of sin” (cf. Rom 7:7; 3:20). For example, the commandment against coveting (Exod 20:17) unveils the heart’s corruption, showing that sin is not merely external but rooted in desires.

  • Conviction without remedy: While the Law diagnoses sin’s presence, it offers no power to overcome it. It leaves humanity “shut up” under its condemnation until faith in Christ arrives (Gal 3:23–24).

2. The Law’s Limitations: Inability to Sanctify (Romans 7:14–25)

The Law, though good, cannot produce holiness in believers:

  • Stimulates rebellion: The Law’s prohibitions paradoxically incite sinful desires (Rom 7:5, 8), highlighting the flesh’s resistance to divine commands.

  • No power to transform: The Law commands righteousness but provides no enablement. Paul’s cry of despair—“Wretched man that I am!” (Rom 7:24)—illustrates the futility of legalistic striving. This aligns this with the believer’s need to rely on grace, not self-effort, for sanctification. 5

The Law’s Fulfillment: Life in the Spirit (Romans 8:1–4)

Romans 8 resolves the tension by showing how the Spirit fulfills the Law’s righteous requirements:

  • Freedom from condemnation: Justification secures believers’ standing (“no condemnation,” Rom 8:1), liberating them from the Law’s curse.

  • Spirit-empowered obedience: The Spirit enables believers to live out the Law’s moral essence (e.g., love, holiness) through inward renewal (Rom 8:4–6).6 This transcends external compliance, fulfilling the Law’s intent (cf. Matt 5:17).

  • Eschatological hope: The Spirit’s work guarantees final victory over sin, assuring believers of their ultimate conformity to Christ (Rom 8:29–30).

Synthesis: The Law’s Role in the Believer’s Life

Three key principles:

  1. Pedagogical function: The Law serves as a “tutor” (Gal 3:24) to drive sinners to Christ by exposing their need for grace.

  2. Moral guide: While believers are not “under the Law” (Rom 6:14), its moral principles reflect God’s character and inform ethical living. The Spirit empowers obedience, fulfilling the Law’s demands.

  3. Anti-legalism: Sanctification flows from union with Christ, not Law-keeping—the believer’s focus shifts from rule-based striving to Spirit-led transformation.

The Law remains strong in its aim of presenting a “holy” standard (Rom 7:12) but finds its telos in Christ, who liberates believers from their condemnation and empowers them to live in the “newness of the Spirit” (Rom 7:6). Thus, the Law’s role is diagnostic, not prescriptive, in progressive sanctification.

Other studies in Romans:

Romans 6: Finding Freedom from Sin

Romans 7: Defines law versus grace.

Romans 8: Defines law versus New Covenant grace.

1. Antinominalism: the view that Christians are released by grace from the obligation of observing the moral law.

2 D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones’ book “God the Holy Spirit,” published as Second Edition in 2002 with the first Edition in 1997.

3 Bible.org

4 D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones

5 Dr. George Grant

6 Desiring God, Dr. John Piper

The Providence of God

When the scriptural guidelines are understood, it becomes clear that all atomic movement in the universe and among his creation only occurs with Christ’s oversight and allowance. This makes sense since he is the co-creator of this world. (Col 1:15-18)

There seems to be nothing in Scripture that would indicate that some things are outside God’s providential control, or that these ways of God’s acting are unusual or unrepresentative of the ways in which he acts generally. Moreover, many of the verses that speak of God’s providence are very general: Christ “continually carries along all things by his word of power” (Heb. 1:3), and “in him all things hold together” (Col. 1:17). He “accomplishes all things according to the counsel of his will” (Eph. 1:11). Such Scripture passages have in view more than exceptional examples of an unusual intervention by God in the affairs of human beings; they describe the way God always works in the world. 1

Notably, two historic, well-studied church leaders, John Calvin and John Wesley, agree on the importance of understanding the doctrine of Providence for our Christian encouragement, albeit their differences of view.

Ignorance of providence is the ultimate of all miseries; the highest blessedness lies in this knowledge. – John Calvin

Among the foremost classic Christian doctrines, “there is scarce any that is so little regarded, and perhaps so little understood” as providence. – John Wesley

Here, we will begin with a the following excerpt from Wilhelm Braekel, Puritan Theologian. The Christian’s Reasonable Service. Edited by Dr Joel Beeke. 2

Consider the providence of God concerning all His creatures…that is, the immediate provision for, and dispensation of all things. This is to be observed in Genesis 22:8, “God will provide Himself a lamb for a burnt offering.” Providence is also referred to as ordinance (Psa. 119:91), God’s way (Psa. 77:13), God’s hand (Acts 4:28, 17:28), God’s upholding (Heb. 1:3), God’s working (Eph. 1:11), God’s government (Ps. 93:1), and God’s care (Job 12:10, 1 Pet. 5:7, Acts 17:28).

The Heidelberg Catechism clearly and devoutly describes providence as follows: The almighty and everywhere present power of God; whereby, as it were by His hand, He upholds and governs heaven, earth, and all creatures; so that herbs and grass, rain and drought, fruitful and barren years, meat and drink, health and sickness, riches and poverty, yea, and all things come, not by chance, but by His fatherly hand; that we may be patient in adversity; thankful in prosperity; and that in all things, which may hereafter befall us, we place our firm trust in our faithful God and Father, that nothing shall separate us from His love; since all creatures are so in His hand, that without His will they cannot so much as move.

Providence is a divine power. This is not merely due to providence being executed by the omnipotent One, but particularly in reference to the extrinsic execution of this power towards His creatures. It is therefore stated with emphasis, “And Jesus, immediately knowing in Himself that virtue had gone out of Him …” (Mark 5:30). Providence is an omnipotent power. When perceiving the magnitude of the work of creation; the innumerable number of creatures; the unfathomable diversity of their natures and appearance; the existence and continuation of each created object according to its own essential nature; the movement of animate, rational, and inanimate creatures; the precise order of all things both as to movement and the manner in which one object initiates the motion and progression of another object—one must lose himself in amazement regarding the infinite power and wisdom of God by which all things are maintained and governed. By this power God irresistibly executes whatsoever He wills, and no one can prevent Him from doing so. “For the LORD of hosts hath purposed, and who shall disannul it? and His hand is stretched out, and who shall turn it back?” (Isa. 14:27); “My counsel shall stand, and I will do all My pleasure” (Isa. 46:10).

Providence is an omnipresent power of God. This is not merely true in reference to the omnipresent Being of God, but particularly in reference to His energizing power in all His creatures. This power of God does not merely manifest itself generally in all things. Neither does it merely affect the initial secondary causes, which in turn further initiate motion and activity in all other secondary causes. This power of God penetrates the existence of every creature, and thus, in an immediate sense and via all secondary causes, affects the ultimate outcome of all things. The power of God is therefore in all things and manifests itself in all that exists and moves. If we had clear perception, we would observe this power in everything.

1 Wayne A. Grudem, Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Leicester, England; Grand Rapids, MI: Inter-Varsity Press; Zondervan Pub. House, 2004), 342.

2 Excerpt: Wilhelm Braekel, Puritan Theologian. The Christian’s Reasonable Service. Edited by Dr Joel Beeke.

Predestined explained by John Stott

When studying theology, theologians often see the truth differently, depending on their denominational upbringing. For example, reformed preacher John MacArthur holds to the doctrine of election, as does the reformed theologian John Stott. Stott explains predestination here, in contradistinction to the opposite view:

Predestination, often misconstrued as fostering apathy, actually maintains a delicate balance. While salvation is indeed God’s work, it does not absolve us of our responsibility before Him. Scripture’s emphasis on God’s sovereignty does not diminish our responsibility, but rather, it underscores the harmony between the two.

Instead, the two lie side by side in an antinomy, an apparent contradiction between two truths. Unlike a paradox, an antinomy is not deliberately manufactured; it is forced upon us by the facts themselves. We do not invent it, and we cannot explain it. Nor is there any way to get rid of it, save by falsifying the very facts that led us to it.

A good example is found in the teaching of Jesus, who declared both that ‘”no-one can come to me unless the Father … draws him” (John 6:44) and that “you refuse to come to me to have life” (John 5:40). Why do people not come to Jesus? Is it that they cannot? Or is it that they will not? The only answer which is compatible with his own teaching is: Both, even though we cannot reconcile them.

Predestination is said to foster narrow-mindedness, as the elect people of God become absorbed only in themselves. The opposite is the case. The reason God called one man, Abraham, and his one family was not for their blessing only but that through them, all the families of the earth might be blessed. Similarly, the reason God chose his Servant, that shadowy figure in Isaiah whom we see partly fulfilled in Israel, but especially in Christ and his people, was not only to glorify Israel but to bring light and justice to the nations.

Indeed, these promises were a great spur to Paul (as they should be to us) when he courageously broadened his evangelistic vision to include the Gentiles. Thus, God has made us his own people, not that we should be his elite favourites, but that we should be his witnesses “to proclaim the glorious deeds of him who has called you out of darkness into his marvellous light.” (1 Peter 2:9). So the doctrine of divine predestination promotes humility, not arrogance; assurance, not apprehension; responsibility, not apathy; holiness, not complacency; and mission, not privilege. 1

1 Stott, J.R.W. (2001) The Message of Romans, Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press (The Bible Speaks Today), pp. 251–252.

The Predestined Elect: Made live with Christ

We herein primarily focus on Ephesians 2:1–7. While Jesus and Peter explain regeneration through the imagery of birth, Paul explains regeneration through the imagery of resurrection from the dead. As the theologian Dr. Hoekema states, for Paul, “regeneration is the fruit of the Spirit’s purifying and renewing activity, that it is equivalent to making dead persons alive, that it takes place in union with Christ, and that it means that we now become part of God’s wondrous new creation.” 1 Paul speaks of God making dead persons alive in Ephesians 2: And you were dead in the trespasses and sins in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience—among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind. But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved—and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. (Ephesians 2:1–7)

In Ephesians 2 we see a powerful picture of what takes place in regeneration. The sinner is dead but God makes him alive. The sinner is in the grave but God resurrects him from the dead. Notice that, contrary to Arminianism, there is no contingency or intermediate stage here in which God begins to make a sinner alive whereby the further outcome of that act is dependent upon the sinner’s decision. Rather, the transition is immediate, instantaneous, and unilateral as the sinner is at one moment dead and the next moment alive (Ephesians 2:10). The situation is comparable with the resurrection of Christ. Christ was dead but God in great power resurrected him bodily from the grave (Ephesians 1:19–20). Or consider Lazarus, who was dead, rotting in the tomb for days, and suddenly, at the command of Christ, was resurrected and walked out of the tomb alive (John 11). The theologian Reymond observes, “The conclusion cannot be avoided that God’s regenerating work must causally precede a man’s faith response to God’s summons to faith.”

Moreover, the sinner who is “made alive” is in a situation not only comparable to Christ’s, but also receives new life that is actually found in and with Christ. Paul states that God made us alive together with Christ and seated us with Christ in the heavenly places (Ephesians 2:6), so that in the coming ages we would know the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ. Paul’s readers have come to life with Christ, who was dead and rose again; their new life, then, is a sharing in the new life which he received when he rose from the dead.

It is only in union with him that death is vanquished and new life, an integral part of God’s new creation, received. Because the believer’s previous condition has been spoken of as a state of death (Ephesians 2: 1, 5), there is no direct reference to Christ’s death or to the believer’s participation in it. Instead, the sharp contrast between our former condition outside of Christ and being made alive with him is presented. The theologian O’Brien is right in identifying being made alive with the resurrection of Christ. As Sinclair Ferguson states, “Regeneration is causally rooted in the resurrection of Christ” (1 Peter 1:3).

Like produces like; our regeneration is the fruit of Christ’s resurrection.” It is Christ’s resurrection which is the very basis of the sinner’s coming to life with Christ, as is further demonstrated in Ephesians 2:6 where the sinner is raised up and seated in Christ. Our spiritual resurrection to new life is made explicit by what Paul contrasts it to, namely, deadness in trespasses and sins and bondage to the world (“following the course of this world,” Ephesians 2:2); and Satan (“following the prince of the power of the air,” Ephesians 2:2); and the flesh (“once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind,” Ephesians 2:3). Like the rest of mankind we were “by nature children of wrath” (Ephesians 2:3). Therefore, being made alive, as O’Brien states, implies not only forgiveness, but also “liberation from these tyrannical forces.” Paul’s words here in Ephesians 2 closely parallel his words in Colossians: “And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses” (Col. 2:13; cf. Rom. 6:11).

Finally, Paul also states that being made alive together with Christ is by grace (“by grace you have been saved”). O’Brien comments, “He draws attention to a mighty rescue which arose out of God’s gracious initiative, which had already been accomplished in Christ, and which has abiding consequences for them: it is by grace you have been saved.” As seen throughout Paul’s epistles, grace stands opposed to merit or any contribution on the part of man (Ephesians 2:8–10). 2

Grace is God’s favor toward sinners in spite of what they deserve (Rom. 3:21–26; 4:4; 5:15). The word “save” (“by grace you have been saved”) can and is many times used to refer to an eschatological reality, the deliverance from God’s wrath and final judgment. As Dr Thielman observes, in some passages Paul can “describe it [saved] as an ongoing event in the present (1 Cor. 1:18; 15:2; 2 Cor. 2:15) and say, ‘Now is the day of salvation’ (2 Cor. 6:2; cf. Isa. 39:8). But Paul “normally refers to it as something believers will experience in the future, presumably at the final day (1 Thess. 2:16; 1 Cor. 3:15; 5:5; 10:33; Rom. 5:9–10; 9:27; 10:9; 11:26).

However, as O’Brien explains, the case differs in Ephesians 2, for “saved” refers specifically to what “has already been accomplished and experienced.” It describes a “rescue from death, wrath, and bondage and a transfer into the new dominion with its manifold blessings. In a roundabout way, the periphrastic perfect construction draws attention to the resulting state of salvation.” Paul is referring to salvation as something that is “emphatically present for believers” even though the “use of the perfect tense in Ephesians 2:5, 8 for salvation is unusual.” 3

Paul does draw our attention to the future eschatological consequences of this salvation in verse Ephesians 2:7, being seated with Christ in the coming age. However, in Ephesians 2:5–6 Paul shows that being saved by grace means that God making us alive together with Christ is also by grace. Therefore, being made alive or regenerated is neither an act that is accomplished by man’s works of righteousness nor an act conditioned upon man’s willful cooperation. Rather, being made alive is by grace and by grace alone, meaning that it is purely by God’s initiative, prerogative, and power that the sinner is resurrected from spiritual death.

Grace is not merely unmerited favor in the sense that one may choose to receive or reject a gift. Grace is the impartation of new life. Grace is a power that raises someone from the dead, that lifts those in the grave into new life. Grace is not merely an undeserved gift, though it is such; it is also a transforming power. Grace imparted life when we were dead, and grace also raises us and seats us with Christ in the heavenlies. (Ephesians 2:6)

Therefore, it will not do to say with the Arminian that God’s grace is a gift to be accepted or resisted. Yes, God’s grace is a gift, but more than that it is a powerful gift that actually and effectually accomplishes new life as God intends.

The Puritan, Matthew Henry notes: Those who have experienced the grace of Christ for a longer time are under more special obligations to glorify God; they should be strong in faith and glorify him more eminently. Yet to glorify him should be the common goal of all. We were made for this, and we were redeemed for this; this is the great intention of our Christianity and of God in everything he has done for us: it is unto the praise of his glory. (Ephesians 1:14). He intends that his grace and power and other perfections will by this means become clearly visible and glorious, and that his people will exalt him.

Further Henry states: Election, or choice, respects that lump or mass of mankind out of which some are chosen, from which they are separated and distinguished. Predestination has respect to the blessings they are designed for; particularly the adoption of children, it being the purpose of God that in due time we should become his adopted children, and so have a right to all the privileges and to the inheritance of children. We have here the date of this act of love: it was before the foundation of the world; not only before God’s people had a being, but before the world had a beginning; for they were chosen in the counsel of God from all eternity. (Ephesians 1:4)

I like to summarize it this way: God predestined us for adoption to sonship through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will— not our free will alone. Free will must be preceded by God’s will to chose us, then He opens our minds to the Spirit’s proclamation of the gospel when heard, as he in continuum also sends the teaching preacher to reveal Christ to that individual.

1 Theologian notes: The Effectual Call of Election, Ron Rhodes 

2 Ibid

3 Ibid

4 Ibid

 

God predestines and calls sinners unto life in Christ.

Man’s willful bondage to sin precipitated his need for God’s grace. We will examine the theological doctrine of effectual calling and regeneration and the difference between Monergism and Synergism.

The Westminster Confession, chapter 10, puts it very well:

10.1. All those whom God hath predestinated unto life, and those only, he is pleased in his appointed and accepted time effectually to call [Rom. 8:30; 11:7; Eph. 1:10, 11], by his Word and Spirit [2 Thess. 2:13–14; 2 Cor. 3:3, 6], out of that state of sin and death in which they are by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ [Rom. 8:2; Eph. 2:1–5; 2 Tim. 1:9–10]: enlightening their minds spiritually and savingly to understand the things of God [Acts 26:18; 1 Cor. 2:10; 12; Eph. 1:17–18], taking away their heart of stone, and giving unto them an heart of flesh [Ezek. 36:26]; renewing their wills, and, by his almighty power determining them to that which is good [Ezek. 11:19; Phil. 2:13; Deut. 20:6; Ezek. 36:27], and effectually drawing them to Jesus Christ [Eph. 1:19; John 6:44–45]; yet so as they come most freely, being made willing by his grace [Song of Songs 1:4; Ps. 110:3; John 6:37; Rom. 6:16–18].

10.2. This effectual call is of God’s free and special grace alone, not from anything at all foreseen in man [2 Tim. 1:9; Titus 3:4–5; Eph. 2:4–5, 8–9; Rom. 9:11], who is altogether passive therein, until, being quickened and renewed by the Holy Spirit [1 Cor. 2:14; Rom. 8:7; Eph. 2:5], he is thereby enabled to answer this call, and to embrace the grace offered and conveyed in it [John 6:37; Ezek. 36:27; John 5:25].

What have we learned from these portions of the Westminster?

First, only those whom God has predestined for life are effectually, truly called and regenerated, contrary to the Arminian view which only sees God’s calling as universal going out to all people on earth. Second, God effectually calls and regenerates spiritually dead sinners to new life by his Word and Spirit and by the grace of his Son Jesus Christ. Here Westminster draws from the biblical metaphors by stating that the Spirit enlightens the mind to understand (Eph. 1:17–18), takes away the heart of stone and replaces it with a heart of flesh [as with feeling, heart-felt respondent to God’s love and the Grace offered the chosen] (Ezek. 36:26), renews the will, and effectually draws the sinner to Jesus Christ (John 6:44–45). Yet, though the Spirit’s drawing is effectual, nevertheless, man comes most freely, “being made willing by his grace.” The will, therefore, is renewed and made willing to believe.1

Moreover, notice the order in which Westminster places God’s grace in reference to man’s faith. In 10.2 Westminster states that the effectual call is purely of God’s grace so that man is absolutely passive. It is only when the sinner has been “quickened and renewed by the Holy Spirit, he is thereby enabled to answer this call, and to embrace the grace offered and conveyed in it.” In other words, man’s answer to the call only comes after the Spirit has “quickened and renewed” and not before. 2

Westminster’s understanding of grace—which was restated by John Owen and Thomas Goodwin’s Savoy Declaration (1658) and the Second London Confession (1677, 1689) of the Particular Baptists—once again demonstrates, as was the case with Augustine, Calvin, and Dort, that it is God’s grace which must precede any activity (faith included) on the part of the dead sinner. 3

Until God effectually calls and regenerates the sinner, no faith will be present. To reverse this order would be to exalt man’s will over God’s grace. One of the main reasons the Puritans in England detested Arminianism. In other words, it “inclines men to pride” by allowing “man’s participation in the work of his salvation.” 4

Arminianism also referred to as Wesleyanism, means that man’s will via his own volitionary will, activates his own faith in Christ by his own acceptance of the Bible’s teaching, via his reasoning faculties, and firms up the process of Salvation in cooperation with God. This opposes the above presentation of the Westminster’s scriptural proof that God alone calls and then activates man’s acceptance via His Spirit to acquiesce to His call to come to Christ.

E. Brooks Holifield…states, “The defining mark of Reformed theology was its regard for the glory of God, which entailed a pronounced insistence on divine sovereignty.” 2

Calvinists have defined and defended Monergism [meaning saved by God’s intervening Grace alone] as a necessary ingredient to the sovereignty of divine grace which alone can preserve God’s glory. What then is the implication for evangelicals today? Michael Horton answers that Arminian and Wesleyan Synergism can no longer be an option for Protestants committed to the Reformation. 3

Synergism means ‘working together’, while monergism means “one work”. Synergists believe that two forces are required to bring about the saving of a soul – the Holy Spirit and the will of man. If a person resists the Holy Spirit, then synergists believe there will be no ‘working together’ to achieve that person’s salvation, which is a convolution of scriptural truth.

ESV Scriptural Proofs on Predestined Election for Contemplation

1 Commentary excerpts: Matthew Barrett, Salvation by Grace: The Case for Effectual Calling and Regeneration, 1st ed. (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2013), 33–36.; and The Westminster Confession

2 Ibid

3 Ibid

4 Ibid

Understanding the Law and the Gospel

My interest in theology is Spirit-driven, believing that Christ leads us into all truth. I acknowledge Him mapping my itinerary in the Word, moving me to clearer doctrinal discernment, with respect for those teachers who have inspired me thus far.

Yet often, when one expands on the law of God in relation to the gospel, there is a fear exhibited by the brethren of Antinomianism (the displacement of the law with the gospel). For this reason, I want to clarify my beliefs once and for all. As a Sabbatarian, which honours the fourth commandment, it is paramount.

If a man cannot distinguish between the law and the gospel, he can never understand any penetration depth of divine truth. If we cannot appreciate the holy law as meant to convict us of sin, and guide us to believe Christ, we cannot have spiritual transformation discoverable in the gospel in the face of Christ. If our view of the gospel is wrong, it often is because the law of God is misunderstood.

That which the precept of the law requires as a duty, the promise of the gospel, offers hope to meet the duty. Whatever commands the place of duty occupies in the law, the place of privilege is experienced in obedience to the call of the gospel. Duties required in the law, call for the insight of grace as it widens faith, articulated in the language of the gospel.

“I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.” (see Exodus 6:6; 20:2; 13:3; 15:13,16; 29:46) set the preface to the ten commandments as the rule of life to the faithful Israel of God, the children of Abraham, now offered to the true church among all nations. (Galatians 3:26, 29) The giving of the law at Sinai with this offering of Himself as redeemer is repeated many times in scripture!

According to the obedience of the redeemed of the Lord to the precepts of his law – the obedience is founded upon the recognition and respect of the articulator of the law, — Yahweh, Israel’s God, and redeemer.

In the laws of our redeeming God is the profound teaching in relation to his law, by which he would reform his people after many years of slavery. (Galatians 3:23-24) The offer to redeem his children and reform them in accord with his law was a type of his new covenant gospel, which he expressed and repeated to enforce our obedience to every commandment of his law as we enter and accept our duty bound to his privileged deliverance from sin in Christ.

Let us consider the law in the light of this privilege of the gospel’s offer of redemption in Christ, with help from my brother, the Puritan John Calhoun, as tightly edited herein to our current colloquium. Among my many studies on law and grace, John Calhoun excels. 1

The law is God’s curriculum that he uses to teach us the primary covenantal progressive guidance that the Holy Spirit still uses to convincingly lead us into the confession of sin and full redemptive atonement and reconciliation with Himself when we observe Christ’s righteousness as he forgives and covers us with His love witnessed in the gospel.

Every passage of scripture is divine revelation, either by administration of law or of the gospel — different in some respects but in agreement by their mutual use of leading and calling his children unto himself.

If our knowledge of the law and the gospel is superficial and indistinct, we will be in danger of mingling one with the other, potentially misunderstanding both legalism and libertarianism, both antithetical to God’s love. Luther, in his commentary on the epistle to the Galatians noted, such an indistinct understanding “doth more mischief than man’s reason can conceive”.

If we blend the law with the gospel, mixing our good works with our faith to earn unmerited salvation, we may miss the fact that we are redeemed from the condemnation of the law, which we are now freed to respect, especially in the understanding of justification.

In the adherence to a lifestyle hoping for sanctification, we must allow the Spirit to work his good pleasure within us, rejoicing in and not obscuring Christ’s glory of redeeming grace, and obtain the joy and peace of his deliverance to the freedom from fear and penalty of the law to the reverence of his moral ethics found in the same law. If you can praise God when you read the Decalogue in Exodus chapter 20 or rejoice when you read Psalm chapter 119, you will understand this peace.

The self-accusatory carnal mind may blind one to the inestimable value of believing in Christ’s substitutionary death in our stead. Without the righteousness of Christ understood as imputed to us by faith, we wear the blindfold of legalism, which retards our progress in the peace and joy of aiming forward to the responsible reformation of trusting his working holiness within, from which good works follow as led by him (Proverbs 3:6; Matthew 6:33).

Conversely, if we can distinguish clearly between the covenant of law and the new covenant of the gospel and yet comprehend both being of grace, we will then come under the illuminating influences of the great light of the Holy Spirit urging us to obey our glorious Lord in all things, even as obedience pertains to His commandments which reveals our sin and our constant need of our Sovereign Lord Christ.

The understanding that the moral law of God is necessary to discern the glory of the whole progressive covenantal scheme of redemptive grace, reconciling all passages of law and grace in scripture which to some may appear contrary to each other – the gospel calming our consciences inspiring us to advance in sanctification toward holiness, which is the opposite of transgression of law (1 John 3:4; Romans 5:20).

As stated in the Decalogue, the law is summarized in the two primary royal laws to love God and our neighbour (Exodus 26:33; Matthew 22:40) — shared by Moses and later in the gospel restated by Jesus. It helps to view Christ properly as our creator (John 1:3; Colossians 1:16), the lawgiver at Sinai, and future judge and articulator of law (1 Corinthians 10:3; Romans 14:10).

In the Trinitarian form of His son Jesus, our Saviour-Redeemer, Yahweh, saved Israel from Egypt and further us from the world (. He advocates the same divine law yet expands the more formally articulated moral laws of the Ten Commandments, understood by those led by the Spirit in mutual synchronicity with the gospel when we are freed from the law’s penalty when we submit to Christ as Lord. The scripture attests that our salvation preceded human life on earth: Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will, to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved. (Ephesians 1: 3-6 ESV)

The moral law signifies God’s declared will, directing and obliging humanity to do what pleases Him and to abstain from what displeases Him.

The harmony of the law and the gospel indicates their mutual subservience to one another for securing and advancing the honour of each other, in subordination to the glory of the triune God — Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, as displayed in the person and work of Christ, our Redeemer.

The law was initially presented as a covenant of works, but now, without the rituals of sacrifice finalized in Christ, is an ethical rule of life, which demands of sinners only that which is offered and promised in the gospel within which everything is freely promised and offered to them, which the moral law, in any of its forms, requires.

The gospel presents to us the righteousness of Jesus Christ, who met every demand of the law in its old covenant form, amending it to the status of the new covenant by grace with his blood (Hebrews 8:22; Luke 22:20; 1 Corinthians 11:25; Romans 3:25; Galatians 2:16). Jesus magnified the law via the gospel making the law honourable, holy, just, and good (Romans 7:12), while it offers and promises the infinite fullness of Christ, by whom Christians may be regenerated and sanctified by faith, enabled to yield obedience to the law as a rule of life as we progress in our relation to Christ in ongoing sanctification, being conformed to his image (Romans 8:29).

The gospel reveals and offers Christ’s righteousness to satisfy the law as a covenant; moreover, it promises and offers strength to obey the law as a rule. Via the Holy Spirit, written in all the divine promises of scripture, the gospel supplies the grace and strength necessary for the acceptable performance of every obedience that the law as a rule of life requires of believers (1 Peter 1:4).

Christ, as our sinless substitute, redeems a man or woman from the due penalty of disobeying God’s law, meeting the requirement of death in our stead, thereby presenting the good news of redemption, the assurance of our peace so that we may accept his substitute righteousness on our behalf (2 Corinthians 5:21; Romans 3:25).

The righteousness which the law as a covenant demands, the gospel affords, being imputed to believers (Philippians 3:9), as the only merits for the offence, being death; offering a continuum in holiness of heart and life, which the law as a rule requires, which the gospel promises and having accepted Christ is obtained (Romans 8:4). Thus, it is clear that the law and the gospel agree together as they mutually serve each other even now as sinners come to realize their need of a Saviour.

How does the law, as a covenant of works agree with the gospel? We cannot cordially believe the gospel without apprehending the need for obedience to the law (Romans 3:23-24). Nor can we yield obedience to the law unless we, by believing the gospel, are equipped by the Holy Spirit and scripture to fathom obedience to the law as a progressive state in the gospel (Romans 8:4). Although entirely distinct from each other, law and grace have no separate agenda, no interfering partisan interest to serve (Romans 3:31).

The principles of the law and the promises of the gospel harmoniously reflect the highest honour in each covenantal period (Galatians 3:21).

The law requires from the sinner perfect human righteousness, which the gospel affords to it— a righteousness which is perfect because it is divine (Romans 10:4; 2 Peter 1;1; Galatians 2:21; Philippians 1:1; Romans 5:21; Romans 3:22; Philippians 3:9; Romans 8:10; 1 Corinthians 1:30).

The grace revealed and offered in the gospel supplies a powerful motive and new disposition to “remember and turn to the Lord.” While the law commands penitential sorrow, the gospel’s grace promised by the Spirit inspires heartfelt sorrow and repentance (John 16:8- 9).

The law directs our mind to acquire all the grace offered in the gospel, while the gospel offers the precious blood of Christ all the requirements of the law (Romans 8:4). The law requires perfect and perpetual obedience as the condition of eternal life; whereas the gospel admits and asserts the necessity of such obedience by affording it to the believing sinner via the great and precious promises engaged by the Spirit in obedience (1 Peter 1:16; 2 Peter 1:4; 1 Corinthians 10:13). The condemnation of the law with its terrors of judgment, under the illuminating grace of the Holy Spirit, serve, to show a convinced sinner his extreme need of the salvation which is presented to him in the gospel.

The law condemns all who reject the gospel, and the gospel, on the other, is antithetical to all who finally transgress the law (1 John 3:4). The terrors of the law frighten and impel convinced sinners to accept the offer of the atonement of Jesus Christ; with the redeeming love manifested in the gospel.

With its commanding and condemning power, the law is in harmony with the gospel as the law leads the sinner indirectly to Christ. The law is our schoolmaster to lead us to Christ so that we might be taught our absolute need of him; the gospel presents Christ as the end of the old covenant of works whereby man sought to keep the law, offering us accountability for an imputed righteousness, never achievable before Christ’s redemption (Galatians 2:21; Hebrews 7:19; Romans 10:4).

The law magnifies the grace of the gospel by showing the sinner his need for justification and salvation by that grace, and the grace of the gospel establishes and magnifies the law. While the precepts and penalties of the law serve as a guard to the gospel, the doctrines, promises, and offers of the gospel serve to support the authority and honourable respect of the law (Romans 8:4).

The threatening of the law and the mercy revealed in the promises of the gospel meet and are bound together in Him. The righteousness manifested in the law and the peace proclaimed in the gospel, offering the righteousness of Christ, do in him embrace each other. “Mercy and judgment kiss each other” (Psalm 85:10).

While the law is an infallible witness, sinners acknowledge that they indeed have no righteousness of their own, under which the offers and calls of the gospel are addressed to them (John 14:6; 6:37). The gospel exhibits in the wonderful person and work of Christ, the highest proofs of the infinite authority, and perpetual stability of the law whose demands Christ met on the cross. (John 19:30).

The righteousness of Christ offered believers the fulfilment of the law: the glory of the gospel on behalf of sinners, offering a proprietary surety of righteousness commanded in the law (1 John 2:2; 1 John 4:10; Romans 3:25; Romans 8:4).

We are invited in the gospel to accept the gift of it and to present it by the hand of faith to be freed from the curse of the law, which is eternal death. In answer to its high demand, Christ’s infinite satisfaction for sin and His perfect obedience as the condition of eternal life is now presented to the Father as our righteousness, which he imputes (or covers us with). Thus, the law as it is the covenant of works is fulfilled in Christ in harmony with the gospel. Christ’s atonement on our behalf is advocated on our behalf before the Father. Christ, as our High Priest in heaven before God, ministers on our behalf (Romans 3:25; Hebrews 2:17; Hebrews 6:19; 7:25).

When the law as a covenant presses a man forward or shuts him up to the faith of the gospel, the gospel urges and draws him back to the law as a rule. The law is his schoolmaster to teach him his need for the gospel’s grace; this grace will have his heart and his life regulated by no rule but the law (Romans 7:7-13; 1 John 2:1).

If the law commands believers, the grace of the gospel gently teaches them to love and to practice universal holiness. What the law, as a rule of life, binds us to perform, the grace of the gospel constrains and enables us to do via the Spirit in obedience (1 Peter 1:3- 5).

The commands of the law reprove believers for going wrong (Hebrews 12:10), and the promises of the gospel, so far as they are embraced, secure their walking in the right way (Ephesians 4:13, 24). The former shows them the extreme folly of backsliding; the latter is the means of healing their backslidings and restoring their souls.

The gospel or word of Christ, dwells only in those who have the law of Christ, put into their minds, and written in their hearts (1 Corinthians 3:16; Romans 8:9; 1 Corinthians 3:16,19; Psalm 51:10). The law cannot be inscribed on the heart, without the gospel, nor the gospel, without the law. Just as they are found together in the same Divine revelation, they dwell together harmoniously in the same believing soul. So great is the harmony between them that they can reside nowhere separate from each other.

While the precepts of the law show the redeemed how very grateful and thankful they should be for redeeming grace, the grace of Christ in the gospel produces praise with adoring gratitude. The law enjoins and encourages believers to receive daily by faith more and more of the grace of the gospel, qualifying them for more spiritual and lively obedience to its principles. The gospel supplies them with every motive preparative to seek this assistance, encouragement unto obedience.

The law reveals the believer’s duty, while the gospel is the focus of duty. It is by the almighty influence of the gospel, in the hand of the Holy Spirit, that the law is inscribed on the hearts of believers, and it is in consequence of having the law written on their hearts that they desire and trust in Christ for the blessings promised in the gospel.

The law enjoins the habit and exercise of faith; the gospel presents Christ, the glorious object of faith.

The law requires believers to love God with all their hearts, but it is the gospel only that presents God in such a view as to become an object of love to a sinner, namely, as the Father is in Christ reconciling the world unto himself.

The law enjoins mourning for sin: the gospel presents Christ as wounded for our transgressions, who, when believers view with the eye of faith, mourn for him as for an only son and are in bitterness for him as for a firstborn.

The law commands them to worship Yahweh – the Father- as their God; the gospel discloses to them both the object and the way of acceptable worship of Him through Christ.

The law is a transcript of all God’s moral perfections representative of His character, and so likewise is the gospel and the representative man, Jesus Christ, the express image of the Father. The law is the image of Yahweh’s holiness, justice, and mercy, as revealed by Christ in the gospel, and, as such, is “holy, just, and good.”

All who are renewed after Christ’s image, in knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness, do evidence this renovation of heart by delighting in his law and by loving and admiring his gospel; by rejoicing greatly in the imputed righteousness, which, the demands of his law as a covenant are all answered, and in salvation by sovereign grace, in which, the promises of his gospel, are all performed.

If a man has attained a saving and experimental knowledge of the gospel, he will undoubtedly evidence it by obedience of heart and life to the law in the hand of Christ as a rule of duty. A man can never perform holy obedience to the law so long as he remains ignorant of the gospel, but when he begins spiritually to discern the truth of the doctrine of redeeming grace, he will then move to begin to perform spiritual and sincere obedience, to the law of Christ as a rule as led by the Spirit of Christ.

The legalist expects happiness for his duties, but the true believer enjoys it in them, and the less he expects for them, the more he enjoys in them. The more he believes the gospel with application and trusts cordially in the Lord Jesus for salvation, the more his “faith works by love,” and the more he appreciates communion with Christ.

Because the law and the gospel harmoniously agree, believers need to be cautious so that they do not set the two in hostile opposition to one another. The opposite is true; one believer ought not to accuse another of being an Antinomian (the displacement of the law with the gospel) simply because he expounds the grace of the gospel’s purpose to be elevated in the means of obeying the gospel via revealing the empowerment of the Holy Spirit’s application of loving God and his neighbour as a fine summary of the law, as revealed by Christ to Moses at Sinai and later to us.

Clear and just views, especially of the agreement between the law and the gospel, under the influences of the Spirit of truth, promote a holy and cheerful frame of mind. Under such a view, you will be able to guard against setting the law in opposition to the gospel.

1 Colquhoun, John. A Treatise on the Law and Gospel,1890.

Christ: Our High Priest of a New Covenant

Updated Theological Paper: Christ: High Priest of a New Covenant

Therefore, since we have a great high priest who has passed through the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our confession. (Hebrews 4:14 NASB)

This study will bring to light the importance of understanding that the new covenant is not simply an addendum to or a continuum of, the old covenant. We will look at the priesthood of Christ to help us determine the differences, as Yahweh was moving Israel out of a works-based law-keeping, view of life. The previous covenant was strongly bent towards the personal disciplined use of willpower alone. God used the old covenant system, with its sacrificial typology, led by the Mosaic written law, outwardly policed by the managing Levites, as a teaching tool to constrain his people as time progressed towards the first advent of the Messiah. My aim is to help nurture the paradigm shift based on scripture. There are many Christians who do not understand the huge shift in the covenantal progression that occurred at the cross when the law was written on the hearts of believers in Jesus Christ, encouraging Spirit-led motivation unto obedience now based on love for Him; concomitant to having love for others in His church.

Without an awareness of the distinctions of the two uniquely different covenants, many of the important doctrines of the church can be terribly misunderstood, namely: Christ’s Ascension, Christ’s Atonement, Responsible Sanctification, The Call of the Elect, and the Leading of the Teaching Spirit.

The Importance of the Truth of Christ’s High Priesthood

Our enemy, Satan attacks especially the doctrine of the High Priestly ministry of Christ because it is central to Christ’s atoning work on the cross to save mankind by faith, warping it into man-made myths. The Prince of Preachers, Charles Spurgeon, emphasized the importance of adhering to Biblical Truth, doctrines in accord with scripture alone:

We need to bind the girdle of truth more and more tightly around our loins. It is a golden girdle, and so will be our richest ornament, and we greatly need it, for a heart that is not well braced up with the truth as it is in Jesus, and with the fidelity which is wrought of the Spirit, will be easily entangled with the things of this life, and tripped up by the snares of temptation. It is in vain that we possess the Scriptures unless we bind them around us like a girdle, surrounding our entire nature, keeping each part of our character in order, and giving compactness to our whole man. If in heaven Jesus unbinds not the girdle, much less may we upon the earth. Stand, therefore, having your loins girt about with truth. (also see Ephesians 6:14, Isaiah 11:5, Revelation 1:13-14)

The Holy Spirit of Christ must give us Spiritual Eyesight to See

Hebrews 8:1–13 defines Christ’s High Priesthood on an entirely different spiritual plane, a new dimension never understood before the Messiah came to Israel. This occurred in the context of a wholly new, altogether different covenant: “in speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away” (Hebrews 8:13; 10:1).

As we study this with regard to Christ’s sacrifice which opened up a new and living way, we must seek to allow the Spirit to free our perception if it is bound to mirror the old covenant antitype of the initial priesthood of the earthly tabernacle in continuum right into heaven, moreover if it disallows the contradistinction of a new heavenly reality of the new covenant paradigm (Luke 22:20; Matt 26:28; 1 Corinthians 11:25).

If we place Christ as carrying on a similar old covenant priesthood in heaven, bear in mind that he could not be a priest according to the old law’s metaphorical methodology as Jesus was not of the Levitical tribe. The divine strategy to move out of the old covenant symbology into the realized actual spiritual sphere of the Holy Spirit working within the hearts of men and women encompassing the church on earth must operate in a non-symbolic new way.

Now, after the sacrifice on Calvary — a singular and final sacrifice once and for all, Jesus must be recognized as the giver of the Holy Spirit whom he breathed on, imparting the gift of the Spirit to the disciples before his ascension (John 20:22); and the church was blessed with the same receipt of the Holy Spirit after Jesus was glorified at the ascension when He sat down with His Father in heaven (John 7:39). Now we view Jesus as our “God, the Judge of all” and as we pray to him we are to know that, we are coming “to Jesus the mediator of a new covenant” (see Hebrews 12:23-24). And the Holy Spirit became the actualizing agent of the church of all the believers. (Galatians 3:2, 14; Acts 1:8; 2:38; 9:17; 19:2;10:47; John 14:17)

Hebrews, chapter 8, addresses the relationship between the sanctuary (or sphere of high priestly ministry) and the sacrifice. Since Christ now exercises His superior High Priesthood in the heavenly sanctuary (Hebrews 8:1–2) which the Lord set up.  His sacrifice differs from and surpasses Old Testament sacrifices which previously dealt with sin, and which priests offered routinely  in the earthly sanctuary (Hebrews 8:3–6).

Hebrews 8:1 introduces this detailed argument of Hebrews 8:1–10:18. The author’s main point is that we do have such a high priest, who sat down at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in heaven. Psalm 110:1 and Hebrews 4:14-16 support this assertion. Psalm 110:4 assures us that our High Priest replaces the Aaronic high priest. Psalm 110:1 assures us that this superior High Priest has sat down at the right hand of the Father. The rest of Hebrews 8:1 through to Hebrews 10:18 shows the significance of His being at the right hand and the adequacy of the sacrifice which enables Him to be there.1

These chapters demonstrate that, because of His sacrifice and heavenly position, He administers a covenant far superior to the old covenant priesthood which was entirely symbolic. Jesus was not a Levite so he could not enter history classified as one of the Aaronic priesthood who’d carry on the system established by Moses (Hebrews 8:4) installed as a system of law to lead Yahweh’s people through the use of symbols and recurring constraints, to lead them to Christ (Gal 3:24-25).

Carefully note the words, “Since then we do have” an active Lord Jesus Christ as our High Priest in the Presence of the Father in heaven, “Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need” (see Hebrews 4:14–16). The epistle describes the greatness of the High Priest that Christians have so that we understand that we are free to enter into the privileges of the kingdom. From Hebrews 8:1 running through Hebrews 10:18, we sharply focus on Christ’s sacrifice. Why dial in on Christ’s sacrifice? Because through it Christ has become the effective High Priest because His past sacrifice enables Him to help us via His advocacy with the Father today.

Hebrews 8:1–2 emphasizes the “location” or magisterial sphere and the authoritative governance that Christ’s High Priestly ministry holds. Predetermined according to Psalm 110:1, God invited Him to sit at His right hand first alluded to in Hebrews 1:3 describing God’s right hand as “the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.”

The description in Hebrews 8:1 is even stronger: the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in heaven. With these additional words, the author of Hebrews emphasizes even more strongly the significance of this place of Christ’s ministry. He underlines the sovereign authority and glory of God the Father in whose presence Christ ministers! Can there be any doubt that this is the sanctuary, and the true tabernacle set up by the Lord, absolutely not by man?

Most good English translations follow the Greek text conjoining the word sanctuary and the true tabernacle, for example, “a minister in the sanctuary and the true tent”. I particularly like the NASB’s correct use of “and” (Hebrews 8:2 NIV; Hebrews 8:2 RSV; Hebrews 8:2 NASB; Hebrews 8:2 ESV).

Where some interpreters get lost

An old school of interpreters believed the writer of Hebrews thought that heaven, where Christ entered, has two parts of which the two parts of the earthly Tabernacle are a copy. The analogical use of language proper to the earthly sanctuary might give the impression that the heavenly sanctuary itself is envisaged as a locality, but we need not suppose that our author thought of it absolutely in local terms.

 1, 2

The outer section of the earthly Tabernacle which Moses constructed was the Holy Place where the priests customarily ministered daily. A second or inner section of this Tabernacle was the Most Holy Place where in some sense God’s Presence dwelt (see Hebrews 9:1–10).

If the writer of Hebrews believed in a two-part heavenly tabernacle, then the sanctuary of this verse must designate the inner of those two parts, the heavenly most holy place where Yahweh God dwells. And if two-part, then it might be reasonable to hold the view that the true tabernacle could be the outer of those two parts — the heavenly holy place through which one must pass to enter the holiest place to be in the presence of Yahweh. Or perhaps consider that the true tabernacle could be a reference to the entire heavenly tabernacle, encompassing both holy place and most holy place. 3  Regardless of how the various schools of thought had viewed the sanctuary: When Christ sat down at the Father’s right hand He entered “heaven itself” to appear in the presence of God (Hebrews 9:24). Therefore it is only logical, that we must see the sanctuary, the true tabernacle as one single reality because Christ immediately ascended into the presence of His Father! Heaven in this view does not have two compartments.

The earthly tabernacle had two compartments indicating symbolically that access to God was not open under the old covenant (see Hebrews 9:6–10). None but the high priest could ever go beyond the first compartment. But now, Christ has opened the way for all to unify with the Father as one (John 17:20-21) through Christ (John 14:6).

The Most Holy Place in relation to The Holy Place

When we look back to the writing of Moses in (Exodus 25:10-22; 26:33–35;37:1-9) we see that only the Most Holy Place contained the ark of the testimony and the mercy seat. The Most Holy Place was separated by a veil from the Holy Place which included the altar of incense (see Exodus 30:1–10) in addition to the lampstand and table (see Exodus 25:23–40). Exodus 26:33 depicts the curtain separated access to all, except the specially qualified high priest (see Leviticus 16: 29-34;14-15), prefiguring that only Christ can open the way to the Presence of God (Hebrews 9:7–14; 10:20).

The Ark of the Testimony/Covenant and the Mercy Seat which is the traditional term for the gold lid on the Ark of the Covenant. Shutterstock sample.

The Most Holy place along with the ark included the mercy seat which symbolized the redemption of Christ. Exodus 25:18–21 revealed that the high priest sprinkled the blood of a sacrificial bull onto the mercy seat as an atonement for the sins of the people of Israel. Today every Christian knows that Jesus Christ is the antitype of the High Priest typified in the old testament’s sacrifices for sin, that His death on the cross was the fulfilment of the most solemn of typified sacrifices on the annual Day of Atonement, for all Israel, extending to all the faithful believers who see this clearly in the Word or God, clearly incontestable when scripture frames this doctrine. Thus when he ascended to heaven Christ Jesus rightly went immediately into the presence of Yahweh, Father God, in the antitypical Most Holy Place as our anchor within the veil.

We have this as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul, a hope that enters into the inner place behind the curtain, where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf, having become a high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek. (Hebrews 6:19-20)

Jesus while praying for the unity of his disciples to be one with Him, as He was one with the Father, it was evident that this would soon occur because He stated: “I am coming to you now” (John 17:13) Jesus taught that He ascended to His Father’s presence, “to my Father”… My God…Your God”! (John 20: 17) I cannot imagine Jesus being relegated to an antechamber awaiting entrance to the presence of Yahweh God! Lenski, a theologian with a brilliant mind, excelling in the Greek language, destroys this viewpoint referencing scripture: By this the Holy Spirit indicates that the way into the holy places is not yet opened as long as the first section is still standing (which is symbolic for the present age). (Hebrews 9:8)

We decline to follow them. In Hebrews 9: 8 the very fact that in the earthly Tabernacle the Holy Place still has its position before the Holy of Holies is pointed out as evidence that the way into the heavenly Holy of Holies has not yet been made manifest. Are we now to believe that such an anteroom still has its position, an eternal position, in front of the Holy of Holies of heaven, and that despite this fact realized post-Calvary, that this anteroom is now not the evidence that it is in v. 8 of Hebrews 9, but rather the opposite, it is the evidence that the way into the heavenly Sanctuary has been made manifest? This anteroom logic surely cannot be the case. If there is an anteroom in heaven as there was in Moses’ Tabernacle, the two antechambers cannot have an opposite significance, to say nothing of this division of heaven apart from any significance regarding the way to the heavenly Holy of Holies. 3 (for cited context)

Who goes to His Father at Christmas, or Thanksgiving, or a long-awaited home visit, and doesn’t aim directly to see him face to face in His presence? Similarly, doesn’t every “good father” long to see His son and embrace him? Even David disconnected from his rebellious son Absalom desperately asked “how is it with young Absolom” and soon wept over the decease of his son: O Absalom my son, my son! (2 Samuel 18:33) And did Yahweh-Father not work united as One with Christ, as the Father, with the Son, via His Spirit, evident in the prayer of Christ for his disciples that the same unity would be allowed for them — to abide in the presence of both the Father and Son together via the Holy Spirit as the portrayal of a church family.

There would be no point in an “outer compartment” in heaven before, at or after Christ’s Ascension after-which He is glorified with the Father for his Atonement work on  the cross. This heavenly sanctuary (Hebrews 8:2) is the place where God dwells, the reality pictured by the Most Holy Place of the earthly Tabernacle. The earthly Tabernacle was only a copy which is why the writer never calls it the true tabernacle. Any antechamber concept destroys the beauty of the anti-type realized now, as it was known doctrinally in Paul’s day and confirmed by the apostles reasoning, especially in the High Priestly prayer of Christ in John 17.

Again, the heavenly sanctuary is the place where God indeed dwells. Its reality clarifies the fact that it was set up by the Lord himself without the agency of man. It is, indeed, equivalent to the God-established permanent city (see Hebrews 11:9–10) or heavenly homeland (Hebrews 11:13–16; 12:22–24). There, God’s people finally find an eternal “rest” in His presence (Hebrews 4:1–11). Christ’s sacrifice belongs to a different dimension, to the realm of the eternal not the temporal. 4

The Corruption of the Anteroom Thesis: In Exodus 27:21 in the old testament period, we see the Lamp inside the veil signifying the presence of Yahweh’s Spirit. When Jesus died the rent curtain signified new access in the New Covenant period from a typical, symbolic presence, obtainable via a corrupt High Priesthood, now directly accessible via the living waters aka living Spirit soon to be reckoned at Pentecost.  Moreover, the Sovereign Father, in union with Christ ascended, would not allow the continuation of the corrupt High Priesthood that crucified Jesus, work out the continuance of the Atonement for him on earth, once ascended. Thus any idea of an anteroom preceding the Most Holy Place continues the corruption that crucified him, doing despite unto the Spirit of Grace.

Christ and His unique Sacrifice (Hebrews 8:3–6)

Hebrews 8:3–5 begins to establish the fact of Christ’s High Priestly ministry in this heavenly sanctuary, especially defining His sacrifice.
If a person is a high priest at all, he has been appointed by God to offer both gifts and sacrifices. The phrase gifts and sacrifices is a comprehensive term that includes the various kinds of Old Testament sacrifices. Offering sacrifice describes, by definition, what it means to be a high priest (see Hebrews 5:1). Christ ministers in the heavenly sanctuary or sphere. If He is a High Priest, and He is, then it is logically necessary for Him, too, to offer something (Hebrews 8:3; 9:12–15; 10:5–10).

The writer of Hebrews clarified that this “something” Christ offers is not the same kind of sacrifice that the Aaronic priests offered! This truth is implied by Hebrews 8:4: If he were on earth, instead of in heaven, he would not be a priest of the Aaronic order at all, much less a high priest, for there are already those who offer the gifts prescribed by the Mosaic law. Christ’s kind of High Priesthood has a sacrifice, but it is a very different kind of sacrifice from that of the Aaronic high priest in the earthly sanctuary.

The necessary difference between their sacrifice and His becomes clearer when we look at the place where the earthly priests serve and its relationship to the heavenly sanctuary of Christ’s service. (Hebrews 8:5) teaches: They serve at a sanctuary that is a copy and shadow of what is in heaven. The New International Version has added the word sanctuary for clarity, but the Greek text is more accurately rendered by the New American Standard Bible: “who serve a copy and shadow of the heavenly things.” 5

Note carefully this distinction: The writer did not even call their location a “sanctuary” at all but only a “copy and shadow.” The scriptures do not imply that every piece of furniture and every detail of the earthly Tabernacle was a copy of something in heaven. He is not affirming exact correspondence between the two, but the inferiority of the earthly. The earthly Tabernacle Moses established mirrored the true approach to God in heaven but only in a shadowy way. It was only a symbolic copy.

We must be hearers of the gospel, to have eyes to see that Christ’s sacrifice must be something of a vastly different quality than the sacrifices appropriate for this “copy and shadow.” 6

We are called to the sanctity of our conscience

In the earthly sanctuary, sacrifices were indeed offered, but their efficacy was sadly restricted; they could not bring “perfection” to the worshiper because they did not affect his conscience. Now we see what our author wishes to teach his readers. The really effective barrier to a man or woman’s free access to God is an inward and not a material one; it exists in the conscience. It is only when the conscience is purified by Christ’s love and offering of His life for us that one is set free to approach God without reservation and offer him acceptable service and worship (Hebrews 10:19–25). We transit from the useless sacrificial blood of bulls and goats — useless in this regard. Animal sacrifice and other material ordinances which accompanied it could affect at best a ceremonial and symbolical removal of pollution. 7

For our author, as for Paul, these things were but “a shadow of the things to come” (Colossians 2:17). As regards the “various ablutions,” not only had the high priest to “bathe his body in water” after performing the ritual of the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16:24), similar purifications were prescribed for a great variety of actual or ceremonial defilements. Now, however, we are created anew within our hearts to serve the living God in holiness and righteousness, this righteousness imputed to us when we confess our sins, and accept Jesus as Lord (1 John 1:9; Ephesians 4:24; Romans 4:8,24; 2 Corinthians 5:21) We now have confidence that we have salvation, motivating us to come to the Lord (1 John 5:14; Ephesians 3:12; Hebrews 10:19). The good news of Christ activates our consciences (Acts 2:37, 23:1, 24:16; Rom 9:1, 14:22). Our conscience is led by the Spirit (Rom 8: 14) and the understanding of what His atoning blood has done on our behalf gives us the confidence to live for Christ with a clear, purified conscience as testified to us via the Holy Spirit (Gal 4:6; Hebrews 9:14; 10:9-10, 22; 13:18; 2 Corinthians 1:12; 1 Tim 1:9, 3:9; 1 Peter 3:16, 21; 2 Pet 2:19; 1 John 3:21). This is our ministry to live in a clear conscience before the world (2 Corinthians 4:2, 5:11).

In 2 Corinthians 5:21, we learn about Christ’s propitiation on our behalf, and imputation of righteousness, when we are accounted as righteous because God the Father looks to Christ who covers us with His atoning work, having died in our stead:

“He [God] made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” Here we have a double imputation. God imputed our sins to Christ who knew no sin. And God imputed his righteousness to us who had no righteousness of our own. The key phrases for us are “the righteousness of God” and “in Him.” It’s not our righteousness that we get here. It is God’s righteousness. And we get it not because our faith is righteous, but because we are “in Christ.” Faith unites us to Christ. And in Christ, we have an alien righteousness. It is God’s righteousness in Christ. Or you can say it is Christ’s righteousness. He takes our sin. We take his righteousness. 8

We must see that the Old Covenant as symbols for the times past

These purifications undoubtedly had great hygienic value, but when they were given religious value there was always the danger that those who practised them might be tempted to think of religious duty exclusively, or at least excessively, regarding externalities. But all these things were “outward ordinances” (NEB), “regulations for the body” (RSV), not for the conscience, with a temporary and limited validity until the “time of reformation.” By the rendering “reformation” we might understand “reformation” in the sense of “reconstruction”; the coming of Christ involved a complete reshaping of the structure of Israel’s religion. The old covenant was now to give way to the new, the shadow to the substance, the outward and earthly copy to the inward and heavenly reality. 9

The New Covenant Reality: the Living Way in Christ, our High Priest

“Therefore, brethren, since we have confidence to enter the holy place by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way which He inaugurated for us through the veil, that is, His flesh, and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience” (Hebrews 10:19-22 NASB). Dr. Keil of the renowned Hebrew Commentary Keil–Delitzsch sees the new Holy of Holies of Daniel 9 in the new covenant period after the ascension, to mean the Most Holy Place as the church where Christ is ministering to sanctify His people and make them holy by the indwelling Holy Spirit empowering them to have a clear conscience — to have “hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience”. :

We must refer this sixth statement (to anoint the Most Holy) also to that time of the consummation, and understand it of the establishment of the new Holy of Holies which was shown to the holy seer on Patmos as “the tabernacle of God with men,” in which God will dwell with them, and they shall become His people, and He shall be their God with them (Rev 21:1-3). In this holy city, there is its temple, and the glory of God will lighten it (Rev 21: 22-23). Into it nothing shall enter that defileth or worketh abomination (Rev 21:27), for sin shall then be closed and sealed up; there shall righteousness dwell (2 Pet. 3:13). 10

Our High Priest and our Royal Priesthood

By cooperating responsibly, motivated by grace (2 Peter 3:31), with the Holy Spirit’s sanctifying work in the church which begins when we first believe (John 15:3; 1 Corinthians 1:2, 30, 6:11; 1 John 3:3), we are purified from the sins of the world by the indwelling Spirit (John 17:19; Ephesians 5:26; 2 Corinthians 7:1; 2 Timothy 2:19; James 4:8; 1 Peter 1:15). Our unity with Christ our High Priest, working within our hearts both individually, and collectively together in the church will be our hope until the Lord returns in glory (John 15:5; 1 Thessalonians 5:23).

As Paul noted, our sanctification will be the work of a lifetime of obedience, as we currently engage in spiritual warfare in our life now and progressively onward in our life- journey, as the Lord leads via His Spirit until we meet Him face to face. (1 John 3: 1-3; Philippians 3:13-15). In this way we also as a church can effectively minister to others the sanctifying Word of our Lord in the new covenant order of Melchizedek 11 (Hebrews 5:9-19, 6:19-20; 1 Peter 2:9).

Corroborating study 1: Melchizedek: Divine Priest of Abraham

Corroborating study 2: The Old and New Covenant Distinctions 

1 F. F. Bruce, The Epistle to the Hebrews (New International Commentary on the New Testament)

2 Christ’ High Priesthood at His ascension noted in Hebrews 9:11, arks the symbolism of the curtain which was rent in two upon Christ’s decease (Matt 27.51; Mark 15:38; Luke 23:45), the curtain symbolizing being his rent body, a way confirmed by the Spirit (Rom 7:6; Hebrews 10:20)!

3 Lenski, R. C. H. (1938). The interpretation of the Epistle to the Hebrews and of the Epistle of James (pp. 290–291). Columbus, OH: Lutheran Book Concern, notes: They suppose that Christ went into the Holy of Holies in heaven (εἰς τὰ ἅγια, v. 12) by first going through something that corresponds to the Holy of the earthly Tabernacle of Moses. This anteroom they find in “the greater and more complete σκηνή or Tabernacle, not handmade, that is, not of this creation.”

But what can this anteroom be? The idea that it is the body or the human nature of Christ is now commonly rejected and certainly has no support in 10:20. Since this σκηνή is “not of this creation” as the writer himself says, the created heavens cannot be referred to as they are referred to in 4:14: “having passed through the (created) heavens” in his ascension. So these commentators think that heaven itself, the uncreated place where God dwells, is divided into two parts that correspond to the Holy Place and the Holy of Holies of the Tabernacle of the wilderness. They think that the writer is exalting this heavenly anteroom “through” which Jesus passed in order to reach the heavenly Holy of Holies that was above the anteroom of Moses’ Tabernacle.

We decline to follow them. In Hebrews 9: 8 the very fact that in the earthly Tabernacle the Holy Place still has its position before the Holy of Holies is pointed out as evidence that the way into the heavenly Holy of Holies has not yet been made manifest. Are we now to believe that such an anteroom still has its position, an eternal position, in front of the Holy of Holies of heaven, and that despite this fact this anteroom is now not the evidence that it is in v. 8 but rather the opposite, evidence that the way into the heavenly Sanctuary has been made manifest? This surely cannot be the case. If there is an anteroom in heaven as there is in Moses’ Tabernacle, the two antechambers cannot have an opposite significance, to say nothing of this division of heaven apart from any significance regarding the way to the heavenly Holy of Holies.

4 Cockerill, G. L. (1998). Hebrews: a Bible commentary in the Wesleyan tradition (p. 167). Indianapolis, IN Wesleyan Publishing House.

5 Ibid

6 Ibid

7 F. F. Bruce, The Epistle to the Hebrews (New International Commentary on the New Testament)

8 John Piper, Desiring God

9 F. F. Bruce, The Epistle to the Hebrews (New International Commentary on the New Testament

10 Commentaries on the Book of Daniel, Vol II, trans. by Thomas Myers (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1948 [reprint]), p 349

11 The order of Melchizedek was symbolic of the new covenant order that Jesus would institute. The mystery of the gospel relates so well to the life of Abraham, a man of faith who trusted God’s Word to lead him (and view Melchizedek as a High Priest who entered into his life in his time of duress).

 

 

 

 

Spurgeon Sermon: God’s Will and Man’s Will

” So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.”— Romans 9:16

THE great controversy which for many ages has divided the Christian Church has hinged upon the difficult question of “the will.” I need not say of that conflict that it has done much mischief to the Christian Church, undoubtedly it has; but I will rather say, that it has been fraught with incalculable usefulness; for it has thrust forward before the minds of Christians, precious truths, which, but for it, might have been kept in the shade. I believe that the two great doctrines of human responsibility and divine sovereignty have both been brought out the more prominently in the Christian Church by the fact that there is a class of strong-minded hard-headed men who magnify sovereignty at the expense of responsibility; and another earnest and useful class who uphold and maintain human responsibility oftentimes at the expense of divine sovereignty. I believe there is a needs-be for this in the finite character of the human mind, while the natural lethargy of the Church requires a kind of healthy irritation to arouse her powers and stimulate her exertions. The pebbles in the living stream of truth are worn smooth and round by friction. Who among us would wish to suspend a law of nature whose effects on the whole are good? I glory in that which at the present day is so much spoken against — sectarianism, for “sectarianism” is the cant phrase which our enemies use for all firm religious belief. I find it applied to all sorts of Christians; no matter what views he may hold, if a man be but in earnest, he is a sectarian at once. Success to sectarianism; let it live and flourish. When that is done with, farewell to the power of godliness. When we cease, each of us, to maintain our own views of truth, and to maintain those views firmly and strenuously, then truth shall fly out of the land, and error alone shall reign: this, indeed, is the object of our foes: under the cover of attacking sects, they attack true religion, and would drive it, if they could, from off the face of the earth. In the controversy which has raged, — a controversy which, I again say, I believe to have been really healthy, and which has done us all a vast amount of good— mistakes have arisen from two reasons. Some brethren have altogether forgotten one order of truths, and then, in the next place, they have gone too far with others. We all have one blind eye, and too often we are like Nelson in the battle, we put the telescope to that blind eye, and then protest that we cannot see. I have heard of one man who said he had read the Bible through thirty-four times on his knees, but could not see a word about election in it; I think it very likely that he could not; kneeling is a very uncomfortable posture for reading, and possibly the superstition which would make the poor man perform this penance would disqualify him for using his reason; moreover, to get through the Book thirty-four times, he probably read in such a hurry that he did not know what he was reading, and might as well have been dreaming over “Robinson Crusoe” as the Bible. He put the telescope to the blind eye. Many of us do that; we do not want to see a truth, and therefore we say we cannot see it. On the other hand, there are others who push a truth too far. “This is good; oh! this is precious!” say they, and then they think it is good for everything; that in fact it is the only truth in the world. You know how often things are injured by over-praise; how a good medicine, which really was a great boon for a certain disease, comes to be despised utterly by the physician, because a certain quack has praised it up as being a universal cure; so puffery in doctrine leads to its dishonour. Truth has thus suffered on all sides; on the one hand brethren would not see all the truth, and on the other hand they magnified out of proportion that which they did see. You have seen those mirrors, those globes that are sometimes hung up in gardens; you walk up to them and you see your head ten times as large as your body, or you walk away and put yourself in another position, and then your feet are monstrous and the rest of your body is small; this is an ingenious toy, but I am sorry to say that many go to work with God’s truth upon the model of this toy; they magnify one capital truth, till it becomes monstrous; they minify and speak little of another truth till it becomes altogether forgotten. In what I shall be able to say this morning you will probably detect the failing to which I allude the common fault of humanity, and suspect that I also am magnifying one truth at the expense of another; but I will say this, before I proceed further, that it shall not be the case if I can help it, but I will endeavour honestly to bring out the truth as I have learned it, and if in ought ye see that I teach you what is contrary to the Word of God, reject it; but mark you, if it be according to God’s Word, reject it at your peril ; for when I have once delivered it to you, if ye receive it not the responsibility lies with you.

There are two things, then, this morning I shall have to talk about. The first is, that the work of salvation rests upon the will of God, md not upon the will of man; and secondly, the equally sure doctrine, that the unit of man has its proper position in the work of salvation, and is not to be ignored.

I. First, then, SALVATION HINGES UPON THE WILL OF GOD, AND NOT UPON THE WILL OF MAN. So saith our text — “It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy;” by which is clearly meant that the reason why any man is saved is not because he wills it, but because God willed, according to that other passage, “Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you.” The whole scheme of salvation, we aver, from the first to the last, hinges and turns, and is dependant upon the absolute will of God, and not upon the will of the creature.

This, we think, we can show in two or three ways; and first, we think that analogy furnishes us with a rather strong argument. There is a certain likeness between all God’s works; if a painter shall paint three pictures, there is a certain identity of style about all the three which leads you to know that they are from the same hand. Or, if an author shall write three works upon three different subjects, yet there are qualities running through the whole, which will lead you to assert, “That is the same man’s writing, I am certain, in the whole of the three books.” Now what we find in the works of nature, we generally find to be correct with regard to the work of providence; and what is true of nature and of providence, is usually true with regard to the greater work of grace. Turn your thoughts, then, to the works of creation. There was a time when these works had no existence; the sun was not born; the young moon had not begun to fill her horns; the stars were not; not even the illimitable void of space was then in existence. God dwelt alone without a creature. I ask you, with whom did he then take counsel? Who instructed him? Who had a voice in that council by which the wisdom of God was directed? Did it not rest with his own will whether he would make or not? Was not creation itself, when it lay in embryo in his thoughts entirely, in his keeping so that he would or would not just as he pleased? And when he willed to create, did he not still exercise his own discretion and will as to what and how he would make? If he hath made the stars spheres, what reason was there for this but his own will? If he hath chosen that they should move in the circle rather than in any other orbit, is it not God’s own fiat that hath made them do so? And when this round world, this green earth on which we dwell, leaped from his moulding hand into its sunlit track, was not this also according to the divine will? Who ordained, save the Lord, that there the Himalayas should lift their heads and pierce the clouds, and that there the deep cavernous recesses of the sea should pierce earth’s bowels of rock? Who, save himself, ordained that yon Sahara should be brown and sterile, and that yonder isle should laugh in the midst of the sea with joy over her own verdure? Who, I say, ordained this, save God? You see running through creation, from the tiniest animalculae up to the tall archangel who stands before the throne, this working of God’s own will. Milton was nobly right when he represents the Eternal One as saying,

“My goodness is most free
To act or not: Necessity and Chance
Approach not me, and what I will is fate.”

He created as it pleased him; he made them as he chose; the potter exercised power over his clay to make his vessels as he willed, and to make them for what purposes he pleased. Think you that he has abdicated the throne of grace? Does he reign in creation and not in grace? Is he absolute king over nature and not over the greater works of the new nature? Is he Lord over the things which his hand made at first, and not King over the great regeneration, the new-making wherein he maketh all things new?

But take the works of Providence. I suppose there will be no dispute amongst us that in providential matters God ordereth all things according to the counsel of his own will. If we should, however, be troubled with any doubts about that matter, we might hear the striking words of Nebuchadnezzar when, taught by God, he had repented of his pride— “All the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing; he doth according to his will in the armies of heaven and among the inhabitants of the earth, and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What doest thou.” From the first moment of human history even to the last, God’s will shall be done. What though it be a catastrophe or a crime— there may be the second causes and the action of human evil, but the great first cause is in all. If we could imagine that one human action had eluded the prescience or the predestination of God, we could suppose that the whole might have done so, and all things might drift to sea, anchorless, rudderless, a sport to every wave, the victim of tempest and hurricane. One leak in the ship of Providence would sink her, one hour in which Omnipotence relaxed its grasp and she would fall to atoms. But it is the comfortable conviction of all God’s people that “all things work together for good to them that love God;” and that God ruleth and overruleth, and reigneth in all acts of men and in all events that transpire; from seeming evil still producing good, and better still, and better still in infinite progression, still ordering all things according to the counsel of his will. And think you that he reigns in Providence and is King there, and not in grace? Has he given up the blood-bought land to be ruled by man, while common Providence is left as a lonely province to be his only heritage? He hath not let slip the reins of the great chariot of Providence, and think you that when Christ goeth forth in the chariot of his grace it is with steeds unguided, or driven only by chance, or by the fickle will of man? Oh, no, brethren. As surely as God’s will is the axle of the universe, as certainly as God’s will is the great heart of Providence sending its pulsings through even the most distant limbs of human act, so in grace let us rest assured that he is King, willing to do as he pleases, having mercy on whom he will have mercy, calling whom he chooses to call, quickening whom he wills, and fulfilling, despite man’s hardness of heart, despite man’s wilful rejection of Christ, his own purposes, his own decrees, without one of them falling to the ground. We think, then, that analogy helps to strengthen us in the declaration of the text, that salvation is not left with man’s will.

2. But, secondly, we believe that the difficulties which surround the opposite theory are tremendous. In fact, we cannot bear to look them in the face. If there be difficulties about ours, there are ten times more about the opposite. We think that the difficulties which surround our belief that salvation depends upon the will of God, arise from our ignorance in not understanding enough of God to be able to judge of them; but that the difficulties in the other case do not arise from that cause, but from certain great truths, clearly revealed, which stand in manifest opposition to the figment which our opponents have espoused. According to their theory— that salvation depends upon our own will— you have first of all this difficulty to meet, that you have made the purpose of God in the great plan of salvation entirely contingent. You have an “if” put upon everything. Christ may die, but it is not certain according to that theory that he will redeem a great multitude; nay, not certain that he will redeem any, since the efficacy of the redemption, according to that plan, rests not in its own intrinsic power, but in the will of man accepting that redemption. Hence if man be, as we aver he always is, if he be a bond-slave as to his will, and will not yield to the invitation of God’s grace, then in such a case the atonement of Christ would be valueless, useless, and altogether in vain, for not a soul would be saved by it; and even when souls are saved by it, according to that theory, the efficacy, I say, lies not in the blood itself, but in the will of man which gives it efficacy. Redemption is therefore made contingent; the cross shakes, the blood falls powerless on the ground, and atonement is a matter of perhaps. There is a heaven provided, but there may be no souls who will ever come there if their coming is to be of themselves. There is a fountain filled with blood, but there may be none who will ever wash in it unless divine purpose and power shall constrain them to come. You may look at any one promise of grace, but you cannot say over it, “This is the sure mercy of David;” for there is an “if,” and a “but;” a “perhaps,” and a “peradventure.” In fact, the reins are gone out of God’s hands; the linch-pin is taken away from the wheels of the creation; you have left the whole economy of grace and mercy to be the gathering together of fortuitous atoms impelled by man’s own will, and what may become of it at the end nobody can know. We cannot tell on that theory whether God will be glorified or sin will triumph. Oh! how happy are we when we come back to the old-fashioned doctrines, and cast our anchor where it can get its grip in the eternal purpose and counsel of God, who worketh all things to the good pleasure of his will.

Then another difficulty comes in ; not only is everything made contingent, but it does seem to us as if man were thus made to be the supreme being in the universe. According to the freewill scheme the Lord intends good, but he must wait like a lackey on his own creature to know what his intention is ; God willeth good and would do it, but he cannot, because he has an unwilling man who will not
have God’s good thing carried into effect. What do ye, sirs, but drag the Eternal from his throne, and lift up into it that fallen creature, man; for man, according to that theory, nods, and his nod is destiny. You must have a destiny somewhere; it must either be as God wills or as man wills. If it be as God wills, then Jehovah sits as sovereign upon his throne of glory, and all hosts obey him, and the world is safe; if not God, then you put man there, to say, “I will,” or “I will not; if I will it I will enter heaven; if I will it I will despise the grace of God; if I will it I will conquer the Holy Spirit, for I am stronger than God, and stronger than omnipotence; if I will it I will make the blood of Christ of no effect, for I am mightier than that blood, mightier than the blood of the Son of God himself; though God make his purpose, yet will I laugh at his purpose; it shall be my purpose that shall make his purpose stand, or make it fall.” Why, sirs, if this be not Atheism, it is idolatry; it is putting man where God should be, and I shrink with solemn awe and horror from that doctrine which makes the grandest of God’s works— the salvation of man— to be dependant upon the will of his creature whether it shall be accomplished or not. Glory I can and must in my text in its fullest sense. “It is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.”

3. We think that the known condition of man is a very strong argument against the supposition that salvation depends upon his own wills and hence is a great confirmation of the truth that it depends upon the will of God; that it is God that chooses, and not man, — God who takes the first step, and not the creature. Sirs, on the theory that man comes to Christ of his own will, what do you with texts of Scripture which say that he is dead? “And you hath he quickened who were dead in trespasses and sins;” you will say that is a figure. I grant it, but what is the meaning of it? You say the meaning is, he is spiritually dead. Well, then I ask you, how can he perform the spiritual act of willing that which is right? He is alive enough to will that which is evil, only evil and that continually, but he is not alive to will that which is spiritually good. Do you not know, to turn to another Scripture, that he cannot even discern that which is spiritual? for the natural man knoweth not the things which be of God, seeing they are spiritual and must be spiritually discerned. Why, he has not a “spirit” with which to discern them; he has only a soul and body, but the third principle, implanted in regeneration, which is called in the Word of God, “the spirit,” he knows nothing of, and he is therefore incapable, seeing he is dead and is without the vitalizing spirit, of doing what you say he does. Then, again, what make you of the words of our Saviour where he said to those who had heard even him, “Ye will not come to me that ye might have life?” Where is free-will after such a text as that? When Christ affirms that they will not, who dare say they will? “Ah, but,” you say, “they could if they would.” Dear sir, I am not talking about that; I am not talking about if they would, the question is “will they? and we say “no,” they never will by nature. Man is so depraved, so set on mischief, and the way of salvation is so obnoxious to his pride, so hateful to his lusts, that he cannot like it, and will not like it , unless he who ordained the plan shall change his nature, and subdue his will. Mark, this stubborn will of man is his sin; he is not to be excused for it; he is guilty because he will not come; he is condemned because he will not come; because he will not believe in Christ, therefore is condemnation resting upon him, but still the fact does not alter for all that, that he will not come by nature if left to himself. Well, then, if man will not, how shall he be saved unless God shall make him will? — unless, in some mysterious way, he who made the heart shall touch its mainspring so that it shall move in a direction opposite to that which it naturally follows.

4. But there is another argument which will come closer home to us. It is consistent with the universal experience of all God’s people that salvation is of God’s will. You will say, “I have not had a very long life, I have not, but I have had a very extensive acquaintance with all sections of the Christian Church, and I solemnly protest before you, that I have never yet met with a man professing to be a Christian, let alone his really being so, who ever said that his coming to God was the result of his unassisted nature. Universally, I believe, without exception, the people of God will say it was the Holy Spirit that made them what they are; that they should have refused to come as others do unless God’s grace had sweetly influenced their wills. There are some hymns in Mr. Wesley’s hymn-book which are stronger upon this point than I could ever venture to be, for he puts prayers into the lips of the sinner in which God is even asked to force him to be saved by grace. Of course I can take no objection to a term so strong, but it goes to prove this, that among all sections of Christians, whether Arminian or Calvinistic, whatever their doctrinal sentiments may be, their experimental sentiments are the same. I do not think they would any of them refuse to join in the verse—

“ Oh! yes, I do love Jesus,
Because he first loved me.”

Nor would they find fault with our own hymn,

“‘Twas the same love that spread the feast;
That sweetly forced us in ;
Else we had still refused to taste,
And perished in our sin.”

We bring out the crown and say, “On whose head shall we put it? Who ruled at the turning-point? Who decided this case?” and the universal Church of God, throwing away their creeds, would say, “Crown him; crown him, put it on his head, for he is worthy; he has made us to differ; he has done it, and unto him be the praise for ever and ever.” What staggers me is, that men can believe dogmas contrary to their own experience, — that they can hug that to their hearts as precious to which their own inward convictions must give the lie.

5. But, lastly, in the way of argument, and to bring out our great battering-ram at the last. It is not, after all, arguments from analogy, nor reasons from the difficulties of the opposite position, nor inferences from the known feebleness of human nature, nor even deductions from experience, that will settle this question once for all. To the law and to the testimony, if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them. Do me the pleasure, then, to use your Bibles for a moment or two, and let us see what Scripture saith on this main point. First, with regard to the matter of God’s preparation, and his plan with regard to salvation. We turn to the apostle’s words in the epistle to the Ephesians, and we find in the first chapter and the third verse, “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ, according as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love, having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself according to the good pleasure of his will”— a double word you notice— it is according to the will of his will. No expression could be stronger in the original to show the entire absoluteness of this thing as depending on the will of God. It seems, then, that the choice of his people and their adoption is according to his will. So far we are satisfied, indeed, with the testimony of the apostle. Then in the ninth verse, “Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself: that in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth; even in him.” So, then, it seems that the grand result of the gathering together of all the saved in Christ, as well as the primitive purpose, is according to the counsel of his will. What stronger proof can there be that salvation depends upon the will of God? Moreover, it says in the eleventh verse— “In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will a stronger expression than “of his will” — “of his own will,” his free unbiassed will, his will alone. As for redemption as well as for the eternal purpose— redemption is according to the will of God. You remember that verse in Hebrews, tenth chapter, ninth verse: “Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he might establish the second. By the which will we are sanctified.” So that the redemption offered up on Calvary, like the election made before the foundation of the world, is the result of the divine will. There will be little controversy here: the main point is about our new birth, and here we cannot allow of any diversity of opinion. Turn to the Gospel according to John, the first chapter, and thirteenth verse. It is utterly impossible that human language could have put a stronger negative on the vainglorious claims of the human will than this passage does: “Born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.” A passage equally clear is to be found in the Epistle of James, at the first chapter, and the eighteenth verse: “Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of first-fruits of his creatures.” In these passages— and they are not the only ones— the new birth is peremptorily and in the strongest language put down as being the fruit and effect of the will and purpose of God. As to the sanctification which is the result and outgrowth of the new birth, that also is according to God’s holy will. In the first of Thessalonians, fourteenth chapter, and third verse, we have, “This is the will of God, even your sanctification.” One more passage I shall need you to refer to, the sixth chapter, and thirty-ninth verse. Here we find that the preservation, the perseverance, the resurrection, and the eternal glory of God’s people, rests upon his will. “And this is the Father’s will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me, I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day; and this is the will of him that sent me that every one which seeth the Son and believeth on him, may have everlasting life, and I will raise him up at the last day.” And indeed this is why the saints go to heaven at all, because in the seventeenth chapter of John, Christ is recorded as praying, “Father, I will that they also whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am.” We close, then, by noticing that according to Scripture there is not a single blessing in the new covenant which is not conferred upon us according to the will of God, and that as the vessel hangs upon the nail, so every blessing we receive hangs upon the absolute will and counsel of God, who gives these mercies even as he gives the gifts of the Spirit according as he wills. We shall now leave that point, and take the second great truth, and speak a little while upon it.

II. MAN’S WILL HAS ITS PROPER PLACE IN THE MATTER OF SALVATION. “Whosoever will let him come and take the water of life freely.” According to this and many other texts of Scripture where man is addressed as a being having a will, it appears clear enough that men are not saved by compulsion. When a man receives the grace of Christ, he does not receive it against his will. No man shall be pardoned while he abhors the thought of forgiveness. No man shall have joy in the Lord if he says, “I do not wish to rejoice in the Lord.” Do not think that anybody shall have the angels pushing them behind into the gates of heaven. They must go there freely or else they will never go there at all. We are not saved against our will; nor again, mark you, is the will taken away; for God does not come and convert the intelligent free agent into a machine. When he turns the slave into a child, it is not by plucking out of him the will which he possesses. We are as free under grace as ever we were under sin; nay, we were slaves when we were under sin, and when the Son makes us free we are free indeed, and we are never free before. Erskine, in speaking of his own conversion, says he ran to Christ “with full consent against his will,” by which he meant it was against his own will; against his will as it was till Christ came, but when Christ came, then he came to Christ with full consent, and was as willing to be saved — no, that is a cold word— as delighted, as pleased, as transported to receive Christ as if grace had not constrained him. But we do hold and teach that though the will of man is not ignored, and men are not saved against their wills, that the work of the Spirit, which is the effect of the will of God, is to change the human will, and so make men willing in the day of God’s power, working in them to will and to do of his own good pleasure. The work of the Spirit is consistent with the original laws and constitution of human nature. Ignorant men talk grossly and carnally about the work of the Spirit in the heart as if the heart were a lump of flesh, and the Holy Spirit turned it round mechanically. Now, brethren, how is your heart and my heart changed in any matter? Why, the instrument generally is persuasion. A friend sets before us a truth we did not know before; pleads with us; puts it in a new light, and then we say, “Now I see that,” and then our hearts are changed towards the thing. Now, although no man’s heart is changed by moral suasion in itself, yet the way in which the Spirit works in his heart, as far as we can detect it, is instrumentally by a blessed persuasion of the mind. I say not that men are saved by moral suasion, or that this is the first cause, but I think it is frequently the visible means. As to the secret work, who knows how the Spirit works? “The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but thou canst not tell whence it cometh nor whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit;” but yet, as far as we can see, the Spirit makes a revelation of truth to the soul, whereby it seeth things in a different light from what it ever did before, and then the will cheerfully bows that neck which once was stiff as iron, and wears the yoke which once it despised, and wears it gladly, cheerfully, and joyfully. Yet, mark, the will is not gone; the will is treated as it should be treated; man is not acted upon as a machine, he is not polished like a piece of marble; he is not planed and smoothed like a plank of deal; but his mind is acted upon by the Spirit of God, in a manner quite consistent with mental laws. Man is thus made a new creature in Christ Jesus, by the will of God, and his own will is blessedly and sweetly made to yield.

Then , mark you, — and this is a point which I want to put into the thoughts of any who are troubled about these things, — this gives the renewed soul a most blessed sign of grace, insomuch that if any man wills to be saved by Christ, if he wills to have sin forgiven through the precious blood, if he wills to live a holy life resting upon the atonement of Christ, and in the power of the Spirit, that will is one of the most blessed signs of the mysterious working of the Spirit of God in his heart; such a sign is it that if it be real willingness, I will venture to assert that that man is not far from the kingdom. I say not that he is so saved that he himself may conclude he is, but there is a work begun, which has the germ of salvation in it. If thou art willing, depend upon it that God is willing. Soul, if thou art anxious after Christ, he is more anxious after thee. If thou hast only one spark of true desire after him, that spark is a spark from the fire of his love to thee. He has drawn thee, or else thou wouldest never run after him. If you are saying, “Come to me, Jesu,” it is because he has come to you, though you do not know it. He has sought you as a lost sheep, and therefore you have sought him like a returning prodigal. He has swept the house to find you, as the woman swept for the lost piece of money, and now you seek him as a lost child would seek a father’s face. Let your willingness to come to Christ be a hopeful sign and symptom.

But once more, and let me have the ear of the anxious yet again. It appears that when you have a willingness to come to Christ, there is a special promise for you. You know, my dear hearers, that we are not accustomed in this house of prayer to preach one side of truth, but we try if we can to preach it all. There are some brethren with small heads, who, when they have heard a strong doctrinal sermon, grow into hyper-Calvinists, and then when we preach an inviting sermon to poor sinners, they cannot understand it, and say it is a yea and nay gospel. Believe me, it is not yea and nay, but yea and yea. We give our yea to all truth, and our nay we give to no doctrine of God. Can a sinner be saved when he wills to come to Christ? Yea. And if he does come, does he come because God brings him? Yea. We have no nays in our theology for any revealed truth. We do not shut the door on one word and open it to another. Those are the yea and nay people who have a nay to the poor sinner, when they profess to preach the gospel. As soon as a man has any willingness given to him, he has a special promise. Before he had that willingness he had an invitation. Before he had any willingness, it was his duty to believe in Christ, for it is not man’s condition that gives him a right to believe. Men are to believe in obedience to God’s command. God commandeth all men everywhere to repent, and this is his great command, “Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved.” “This is the commandment, that ye believe in Jesus Christ whom he has sent.” Hence your right and your duty to believe; but once you have got the willingness, then you have a special promise— “Whosoever will let him come.” That is a sort of extraordinary invitation. Methinks this is the utterance of the special call. You know how John Bunyan describes the special call in words to this effect. “The hen goes clucking about the farm-yard all day long; that is the general call of the gospel; but she sees a hawk up in the sky, and she gives a sharp cry for her little ones to come and hide under her wings; that is the special call; they come and are safe.” My text is a special call to some of you. Poor soul! are you willing to be saved? “O, sir, willing, willing indeed; I cannot use that word; I would give all I have if I might but be saved.” Do you mean you would give it all in order to purchase it? “Oh no, sir, I do not mean that; I know I cannot purchase it; I know it is God’s gift, but still, if I could but be saved, I would ask nothing else.

‘Lord, deny me what thou wilt,
Only ease me of my guilt ;
Suppliant at thy feet I lie,
Give me Christ, or else I die.’

Why, then the Lord speaks to you this morning, to you if not to any other man in the chapel, he speaks to you and says— “Whosoever will let him come.” You cannot say this does not mean you. When we give the general invitation, you may exempt yourself perhaps in some way or other, but you cannot now. You are willing, then come and take the water of life freely. “Had not I better pray?” It does not say so; it says, take the water of life. “But had not I better go home and get better?” No, take the water of life, and take the water of life now. You are standing by the fountain outside there, and the -water is flowing and you are willing to drink; you are picked out of a crowd who are standing round about, and you are specially invited by the person who built the fountain. He says, “Here is a special invitation for you; you are willing; come and drink.” “Sir,” you say, “I must go home and wash my pitcher.” “No,” says he, “come and drink.” “But, sir, I want to go home and write a petition to you.” “I do not want it,” he says, “drink now, drink now.” What would you do? If you were dying of thirst, you would just put your lips down and drink. Soul, do that now. Believe that Jesus Christ is able to save thee now. Trust thy soul in his hands now. No preparation is wanted. Whosoever will let him come; let him come at once and take the water of life freely. To take that water is simply to trust Christ; to repose on him; to take him to be your all in all. Oh that thou wouldest do it now!

Thou art willing; God has made thee willing. When the crusaders heard the voice of Peter the hermit, as he bade them go to Jerusalem to take it from the hands of the invaders, they cried out at once, “Deus vult; God wills it; God wills it;” and every man plucked his sword from its scabbard, and set out to reach the holy sepulchre, for God willed it. So come and drink, sinner; God wills it. Trust Jesus; God wills it. If you will it, that is the sign that God wills it. “Father, thy will be done on earth even as it is in heaven.” As sinners, humbly stoop to drink of the flowing crystal which streams from the sacred fountain which Jesus opened for his people; let it be said in heaven, “God’s will is done; hallelujah, hallelujah!” “It is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy;” yet ” Whosoever will let him come and take the water of life freely.”

ESV Scriptures on Election to meditate on.