Tag Archives: devotion

Uncategorized

Romans: The Spirit of Life

Tracing the theme of the Holy Spirit (the Pneuma) through Paul’s epistles reveals a shift from legalism to a life defined by internal divine guidance.

Below are the key scriptures from your requested books, translated from the English Standard Version (ESV). Due to the high frequency of mentions (especially in Romans and 1 Corinthians), I have selected the most definitive passages that define the Spirit’s role in the believer’s life.

Romans: The Spirit of Life

In Romans, Paul contrasts the “flesh” with the “Spirit,” framing the Holy Spirit as the power that fulfills the Law where human effort fails.

  • Romans 5:5 – “and hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.”

  • Romans 8:9 – “You, however, are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if in fact the Spirit of God dwells in you. Anyone who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him.”

  • Romans 8:11 – “If the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit who dwells in you.”

  • Romans 8:26 – “Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness. For we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words.”

  • Romans 15:13 – “May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, so that by the power of the Holy Spirit you may abound in hope.”

1 Corinthians: The Spirit of Wisdom and Unity

Here, the Spirit is presented as the source of revelation and the “distributor” of spiritual gifts to the Body of Christ.

  • 1 Corinthians 2:10 – “these things God has revealed to us through the Spirit. For the Spirit searches everything, even the depths of God.”

  • 1 Corinthians 3:16 – “Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you?”

  • 1 Corinthians 6:19 – “Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own,”

  • 1 Corinthians 12:4 – “Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit.”

  • 1 Corinthians 12:13 – “For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and all were made to drink of one Spirit.”

Galatians: The Spirit of Liberty

Paul focuses on the “Fruit of the Spirit” as the evidence of a life lived under grace rather than the Mosaic Law.

  • Galatians 3:2 – “Let me ask you only this: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith?”

  • Galatians 4:6 – “And because you are sons, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying, ‘Abba! Father!'”

  • Galatians 5:16 – “But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh.”

  • Galatians 5:22-23 – “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.”

  • Galatians 5:25 – “If we live by the Spirit, let us also keep in step with the Spirit.”

Ephesians: The Spirit of Promise

Ephesians emphasizes the Spirit as a “seal” or guarantee of the believer’s inheritance.

  • Ephesians 1:13-14 – “In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, who is the guarantee of our inheritance until we acquire possession of it, to the praise of his glory.”

  • Ephesians 4:30 – “And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.”

  • Ephesians 5:18 – “And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit,”

  • Ephesians 6:17 – “and take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,”

  • Ephesians 6:18 – “praying at all times in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication.”

Uncategorized

Regeneration: The Spirit Giving Life

The concepts of Regeneration (the initial act of being “born again”) and Transformation (the ongoing process of being changed into the likeness of Christ) are central to New Testament theology.

Below are the primary scriptures where the Holy Spirit is explicitly linked to these two divine works.

1. Regeneration: The Spirit Giving Life

Regeneration is the “new birth.” In these texts, the Holy Spirit is the agent who moves a person from spiritual death to spiritual life.

  • John 3:5–6 > “Jesus answered, ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.'”

  • John 6:63 > “It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh is no help at all. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.”

  • Titus 3:5 > “he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit,”

  • 1 Peter 1:2 > “according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in the sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and for sprinkling with his blood: May grace and peace be multiplied to you.”

2. Transformation: The Spirit Shaping the Believer

Transformation (metamorphoō) is the process where the Holy Spirit aligns the believer’s mind, character, and actions with those of Jesus.

  • Romans 12:2 > “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”

  • 2 Corinthians 3:18 > “And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit.”

  • Galatians 4:19 > “my little children, for whom I am again in the anguish of childbirth until Christ is formed in you!” (Contextually through the Spirit mentioned in 4:6).

  • Philippians 1:6 > “And I am sure of this, that he who began a good work in you [the Spirit’s work in regeneration] will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ.”

3. The Synergy of Both

These passages bridge the gap between being made new (Regeneration) and staying new (Transformation).

  • Ezekiel 36:26–27 (The Prophetic Foundation) > “And I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you. And I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. And I will put my Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes and be careful to obey my rules.”

  • 2 Thessalonians 2:13 > “But we ought always to give thanks to God for you, brothers beloved by the Lord, because God chose you as the firstfruits to be saved, through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth.”

  • Romans 8:13 > “For if you live according to the flesh you will die, but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live.”

Comparison of the Spirit’s Work

Aspect Definition Key Scriptural Term
Regeneration Initial spiritual birth; a point-in-time event. Palingenesia (Washing of renewal)
Transformation Gradual growth in holiness; a lifelong process. Metamorphoō (Transfigured/Changed)

Notice the distinction Paul makes in Titus 3:5 between the “washing” and the “renewal” as two sides of the same coin.

Uncategorized

Cautions of Prioritizing Rigid Logical Biblical Systems

D.A. Carson, a renowned New Testament scholar, views systematic theology as a necessary discipline for any serious believer. However, he focuses on the risks of prioritizing a rigid logical system over the nuance of the biblical text itself. 1 Carson’s critique usually centers on how our “systems” can accidentally muffle the actual voice of God in Scripture. Here are the core dangers he identifies:

1. The Danger of “Flattening” the Text

Systematic theology often seeks to harmonize diverse biblical passages into a single, cohesive statement. Carson warns that this can lead to “flattening” the text:

  • The Issue: If you have a system for “The Love of God,” you might ignore the different ways the Bible speaks of love (e.g., God’s elective love vs. His providential love for all creation).

  • The Consequence: You lose the “texture” of the Bible. The system becomes a steamroller that smooths out the intentional tensions the biblical authors left behind.

2. Proof-Texting and Decontextualization

When the “System” is the master, the Bible often becomes a mere warehouse for “bricks” (verses) to build it.

  • The Trap: Users may pluck a verse from its historical and literary context to fit a pre-existing category.

  • Carson’s View: We must engage in Biblical Theology (tracking themes through the story of the Bible) before we jump to Systematic Theology. If the system dictates the meaning of the verse rather than the verse shaping the system, we’ve reversed the proper authority.

3. Philosophical Over-Extrapolation

Carson points out that systems often use logic to fill gaps, whereas the Bible is silent on this.

  • The “Logic Gap”: If Point A and Point B are true, a system often insists Point C must also be true, even if Scripture doesn’t say so.

  • The Risk: We end up defending a philosophical deduction with the same fervour we use for a clear biblical command.

4. Cultural and Historical Blindness

Every system is built by people influenced by their own era. Carson warns that we can become “children of our age” without knowing it.

  • The Warning: If we treat a 17th-century or 20th-century confession as the final, perfect map of truth, we may fail to see how our specific culture blinds us to certain biblical emphases (such as social justice or the role of the Holy Spirit).

The “Carson Solution”: A Two-Way Street

Carson advocates for a hermeneutical loop. While we need a system to understand the parts, we must allow the parts (the individual verses) to constantly reform and challenge our system.

“Systematic theology is a bit like a map. It’s incredibly helpful for navigation, but if the map says there’s a bridge where the actual ground shows a canyon, you trust the ground, not the map.”

Summary Table

The Danger The Result
Systematizing too early Ignoring the unique “voice” of the biblical author.
Philosophical pride Valuing logic over the “mystery” of revelation.
Textual abuse Using verses as “proof-texts” rather than listening to their context.
Stagnation Assuming our current system cannot be corrected by further study.

1 D.A. Carson

Uncategorized

A Fresh Look at the Sermon on the Mount

Dr. Jonathan Pennington, a New Testament scholar at Southern Seminary, offers a distinct and influential interpretation of the Sermon on the Mount, primarily through his seminal work, The Sermon on the Mount and Human Flourishing: A Theological Commentary (2017).

His teachings move away from viewing the Sermon as an “impossible law” designed to crush the listener (a common Lutheran/Reformed reading) and instead present it as a guide for the good life. 1

Part 1

1. The Core Definition

Pennington defines the Sermon on the Mount as a:

“Christocentric, flourishing-oriented, kingdom-awaiting, eschatological wisdom exhortation.”

This mouthful essentially means that Jesus is teaching his disciples how to truly thrive (flourish) as human beings by living in alignment with God’s kingdom, even while suffering in the present world.

2. Key Linguistic Shifts

Pennington argues that traditional translations often miss the nuances of “virtue” and “wisdom” in the original Greek. He proposes two major re-translations:

  • From “Blessed” to “Flourishing” (Makarios):

    Pennington argues that makarios (the first word of the Beatitudes) isn’t just about a divine “blessing” or a feeling of happiness. Drawing from the Hebrew ashre (found in Psalm 1), he suggests it refers to a state of being. To be makarios is to be in a state of human flourishing—a life well-lived in God’s presence.

  • From “Perfect” to “Whole” (Teleios):

    In Matthew 5:48 (“Be perfect as your Father is perfect”), Pennington argues that teleios means wholeness or integrity. It’s not about “flawlessness” but about being “single-hearted” or “undivided” in one’s devotion to God, contrasting with the “double-minded” hypocrisy of the Pharisees.

3. The “Virtue Ethics” Approach

Pennington situates the Sermon within two historical contexts: Jewish Wisdom literature (such as Proverbs) and Greco-Roman Virtue Ethics (such as Aristotle).

  • Character over Rules: He teaches that Jesus isn’t just giving a new set of “harder rules” (e.g., don’t just avoid murder, avoid anger). Instead, Jesus is interested in character formation.

  • The Heart of the Matter: The Sermon is a “cardiographic” (heart-focused) teaching. It’s about the internal disposition of the person rather than just external conformity.

4. Key Theological Themes

Theme Pennington’s Teaching
Greater Righteousness Not just more rules, but a “whole-person” righteousness that starts in the heart.
Eschatological Hope Flourishing is “already but not yet.” We experience it now through virtue, but it is fully realized only when God’s kingdom arrives.
The Fatherhood of God Pennington highlights how often Jesus calls God “Father” in the Sermon, suggesting that flourishing is rooted in a secure, familial relationship with God.
Paradox of Suffering He teaches that Christian flourishing is unique because it can coexist with suffering and persecution.

5. Summary of Impact

Pennington’s work has been praised for bridging the gap between Jesus and Paul. While some fear that focusing on “virtue” and “works” undermines grace, Pennington argues that God’s grace enables the disciple to live a virtuous life. He invites readers to see the Sermon not as a burden, but as an invitation to the most beautiful and complete way of being human.

In short: For Pennington, the Sermon on the Mount is Jesus’s answer to the ultimate human question: “How can I truly live well?”

Part 2

To understand the Sermon on the Mount through Dr. Pennington’s lens of human flourishing and wholeness, we can examine specific scriptural passages in which Jesus redefines what it means to be a “whole” person. Here are four key areas defined by the text:

1. The Heart of Human Flourishing (The Beatitudes)

Scripture: Matthew 5:3–12

Pennington views these not as “entrance requirements” for heaven, but as a map of the “good life” in God’s kingdom.

  • The Logic: Jesus uses “Macarisms” (statements beginning with Makarios).

  • The Insight: States traditionally viewed as miserable—poverty of spirit, mourning, and persecution—are redefined as “flourishing” because they position the person to receive the comfort and inheritance of the Kingdom.

2. The Wholeness of the Law (The Antitheses)

Scripture: Matthew 5:21–48

Jesus uses the formula, “You have heard that it was said… but I say to you.” This section is often called the “Antitheses.”

  • The Insight: Pennington emphasizes Matthew 5:48: “Be perfect [teleios], therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” * The Wholeness Aspect: Jesus isn’t just raising the bar to make it harder; he is demanding integrity. Not to murder is good, but to remove the root of anger (Matthew 5:22) is to become “whole” (teleios). It is an invitation to align your internal desires with your external actions.

3. Secret Piety vs. Public Performance

Scripture: Matthew 6:1–18

Jesus addresses three pillars of Jewish life: Almsgiving (Matt 6:2), Prayer (Matt 6:5), and Fasting (Matt 6:16).

  • The Insight: The “Hypocrite” (Greek for “actor”) performs for the applause of people.

  • The Wholeness Aspect: Flourishing requires a “singular eye” focused on the Father. Pennington points out that when our religious life is lived for the audience of God alone, we find freedom from the exhausting need for human approval. This is the essence of undivided devotion.

4. The Priority of the Kingdom (Anxiety and Wealth)

Scripture: Matthew 6:19–34

Jesus addresses the two biggest distractions to a flourishing life: money and worry.

  • The Insight: Matthew 6:24 states, “No one can serve two masters.” This is the “double-mindedness” that Pennington argues Jesus is trying to cure.

  • The Logic of Flourishing: By seeking first the kingdom and his righteousness (Matt 6:33), the disciple is released from the “fragmented” life of anxiety. Wholeness is found when the Fatherhood of God becomes the foundation for our physical security.

Comparison of the Two Ways

The Sermon concludes in Matthew 7:13–27 with a series of contrasts (two gates, two trees, two builders). This is classic Wisdom Literature style.

The Divided/Foolish Life The Whole/Flourishing Life
Focus on “the Broadway” (Ease) Focus on “the Narrow Way” (Virtue)
Religious “acting” (Hypocrisy) Secret Piety (Integrity)
Built on hearing only Built on hearing and doing

Pennington’s overarching point is that these scriptures aren’t just ethical commands; they are a “vision of the beauty of the Christ-centred life” that leads to the ultimate telos (goal) of human existence.

Does this focus on “wholeness” change how you view the “hard sayings” of Jesus, like turning the other cheek?

1 Dr. Jonathan Pennington, a New Testament scholar at Southern Seminary, offers a distinct and influential interpretation of the Sermon on the Mount, primarily through his seminal work, The Sermon on the Mount and Human Flourishing: A Theological Commentary (2017).

Uncategorized

Redemptive Biblical Counsel

Biblical counselling, as pioneered by Jay Adams and refined by Paul David Tripp, is centred on the belief that the Bible is sufficient to address the complex issues of the human condition. 1 While Adams provided the foundational “Nouthetic” framework, 2 Tripp expanded the model to emphasize the heart, the community, and the process of “incarnational” ministry. 3

The following sections synthesize the four-step process defined by Adams with the heart-oriented lessons found in Tripp’s Instruments in the Redeemer’s Hands.

1. Love: Building the Relationship and Entering the World

Jay Adams begins his process with Inventory, which Tripp refines into the “Love” stage. Before change can happen, the counsellor must enter the person’s world to build a bridge of trust.

  • The Incarnational Model: Tripp argues that we are called to represent Christ by being his “instruments.” This requires a sacrificial entry into the sufferer’s life.

  • Scripture Reference: Hebrews 4:15. Tripp uses this to show that Christ, our Great High Priest, sympathizes with our weaknesses, providing the ultimate template for empathetic counselling.

2. Know: Data Gathering and Heart Discovery

In Adams’ framework, this aligns with Enlightenment. However, Tripp emphasizes that we aren’t just looking for facts; we are looking for the “idols of the heart” that drive behaviour.

  • Asking Discovery Questions: Counselling is not just about giving answers; it is about asking questions that expose the person’s functional “rulers” (what they love, fear, or crave).

  • Scripture Reference: Luke 6:43-45. Tripp frequently cites this to explain that the “mouth speaks what the heart is full of.” To change the fruit (behaviour), one must address the root (the heart).

3. Speak: Truth-Telling and the Confrontation of Sin

This stage corresponds to Adams’ Commitment phase, where the counsellor brings the Word of God to bear on the person’s specific situation. This is not “bashing” with the Bible, but speaking the truth in love.

  • Reinterpreting Life through the Gospel: The counsellor helps the person see their circumstances through God’s “story” rather than their own narrative of victimhood or self-righteousness.

  • Scripture Reference: Ephesians 4:15. Tripp emphasizes that “speaking the truth in love” is the primary mechanism for growth in the body of Christ. Truth without love is harsh; love without truth is sentimentalism.

4. Do: Implementation and Radical Change

Adams refers to this as Evaluation/Implementation, while Tripp focuses on the “Do” stage—the practical application of insights into daily life.

  • The Process of Sanctification: Change is rarely a single event; it is a “process” of putting off old habits and putting on new ones (Habituation).

  • Scripture Reference: James 1:22-25. Tripp utilizes this text to warn against being “hearers only.” Real change is verified by the “doing” of the Word in the mundane moments of life.

Comparison of Methodologies

Feature Jay Adams (How to Help People Change) Paul David Tripp (Instruments)
Primary Focus Behavioural change and Nouthetic (confrontational) correction. Heart transformation and “incarnational” community.
Counsellor’s Role The teacher/authority directing the process. A “fellow-sufferer” and instrument in God’s hands.
Change Model Four Steps: Inventory, Enlightenment, Commitment, Implementation. Four Stages: Love, Know, Speak, Do.
The “Why” Obedience to God’s commands. Worship and the displacement of heart-idols.

The Goal: Redemptive Ministry

Both authors agree that the ultimate goal is not merely “feeling better” but Christlikeness. Tripp’s Facilitator’s Guide emphasizes that every believer is called to this work. As he famously states, we are “people in need of change helping people in need of change,” grounded in the finished work of Christ.

1 Paul David Tripp: Instruments in the Redeemer’s Hands

2. Jay Adams, How to Help People Change: The Four-Step Biblical Process

3. Paul David Tripp: Facilitator’s Guide

Uncategorized

Concerns with Systematic Theology – D. A. Carson

D.A. Carson, a renowned New Testament scholar, doesn’t argue that systematic theology is inherently “bad.” In fact, he views it as a necessary discipline for any serious believer. However, his teaching on its dangers focuses on the risks of prioritizing a rigid logical system over the nuance of the biblical text itself.

Carson’s critique usually centers on how our “systems” can accidentally muffle the actual voice of God in Scripture. Here are the core dangers he identifies:

1. The Danger of “Flattening” the Text

Systematic theology often seeks to harmonize diverse biblical passages into a single, cohesive statement. Carson warns that this can lead to flattening:

  • The Issue: If you have a system for “The Love of God,” you might ignore the different ways the Bible speaks of love (e.g., God’s elective love vs. His providential love for all creation).

  • The Consequence: You lose the “texture” of the Bible. The system becomes a steamroller that smooths out the intentional tensions the biblical authors left behind.

2. Proof-Texting and Decontextualization

When the “System” is the master, the Bible often becomes a mere warehouse for “bricks” (verses) to build it.

  • The Trap: Users may pluck a verse from its historical and literary context to fit a pre-existing category.

  • Carson’s View: We must engage in Biblical Theology (tracking themes through the story of the Bible) before we jump to Systematic Theology. If the system dictates the meaning of the verse rather than the verse shaping the system, we’ve reversed the proper authority.

3. Philosophical Over-Extrapolation

Carson points out that systems often use logic to fill in gaps where the Bible is silent.

  • The “Logic Gap”: If Point A and Point B are true, a system often insists Point C must also be true, even if Scripture doesn’t say so.

  • The Risk: We end up defending a philosophical deduction with the same fervor we use for a clear biblical command.

4. Cultural and Historical Blindness

Every system is built by people influenced by their own era. Carson warns that we can become “children of our age” without knowing it.

  • The Warning: If we treat a 17th-century or 20th-century confession as the final, perfect map of truth, we may fail to see where our specific culture has blinded us to certain biblical emphases (like social justice, or the role of the Holy Spirit).

The “Carson Solution”: A Two-Way Street

Carson advocates for a hermeneutical loop. While we need a system to understand the parts, we must allow the parts (the individual verses) to constantly reform and challenge our system.

“Systematic theology is a bit like a map. It’s incredibly helpful for navigation, but if the map says there’s a bridge where the actual ground shows a canyon, you trust the ground, not the map.”

Summary Table

The Danger The Result
Systematizing too early Ignoring the unique “voice” of the biblical author.
Philosophical pride Valuing logic over the “mystery” of revelation.
Textual abuse Using verses as “proof-texts” rather than listening to their context.
Stagnation Assuming our current system cannot be corrected by further study.

Are you researching this in the context of a specific book by Carson, like The Gagging of God or his essays on theological method?

Uncategorized

Will Christ’s church be raptured?

The relationship between the teachings of Jesus and the writings of the Apostle Paul regarding the “Rapture” is a central theme in Christian eschatology. While the specific word rapture does not appear in the original Greek of the New Testament (it comes from the Latin rapiemur), both Jesus and Paul describe a definitive moment where believers are gathered to meet the Lord.

Their teachings align on several key pillars: suddenness, divine gathering, and the requirement of readiness.

1. The Divine Gathering

Both Jesus and Paul speak of a supernatural assembly of believers initiated by a heavenly signal.

  • Jesus: In the Olivet Discourse, Jesus describes the Son of Man coming on the clouds.” And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.” (Matthew 24:31)
  • Paul: Paul uses nearly identical imagery when describing the “catching up” of the church. For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command… and with the trumpet call of God… we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air.” (1 Thessalonians 4:16–17)

2. The Element of Surprise: The “Thief in the Night”

One of the strongest linguistic and conceptual links between Jesus and Paul is the metaphor of a thief. They both emphasize that the timing of this event is unknowable and will catch the world off guard.

  • Jesus: “But understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept watch…” (Matthew 24:43).
  • Paul: “For you know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night.” (1 Thessalonians 5:2).

3. The Concept of “One Taken, One Left.”

Jesus provided a vivid illustration of the selective nature of this gathering, which aligns with Paul’s teaching that this event specifically concerns “those who are in Christ.”

  • Jesus: He describes everyday scenarios—men in a field or women grinding grain—where “one will be taken and the other left” (Matthew 24:40–41).
  • Paul: He clarifies that this “taking” involves a physical transformation. He explains that “we will not all sleep, but we will all be changed—in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye” (1 Corinthians 15:51–52).

4. Summary Alignment Table

Feature Jesus (Gospels) Paul (Epistles)
The Signal A loud trumpet call The trumpet of God
The Agent The Son of Man / Angels The Lord Himself
The Action Gathering the elect Caught up (Harpazo)
The Timing Unknown; like a thief Suddenly, like a thief
The Location From the earth to the clouds Meeting in the air

5. The Moral Objective: Watchfulness

The ultimate alignment between Jesus and Paul is not just about the mechanics of the event, but the intended result for the believer.

Jesus taught, “Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come” (Matthew 24:42). Paul echoes this moral imperative, telling believers they are “children of the light” and should therefore “not sleep, as others do, but let us keep awake and be sober” (1 Thessalonians 5:6).

Both emphasize that the doctrine of the gathering is meant to produce hope and holiness, rather than just a timeline for the future.

Uncategorized

Exposing The Law of Attraction

Herein, we focus on the “spiritual Trojan Horse” of the Law of Attraction (LOA) and how it subtly replaces biblical faith with occult principles, with scriptures to support the warnings.

1. The Core Deception: “You Are God”

Scafidi argues that the fundamental root of the Law of Attraction is the belief that humans have the innate power to create their own reality through their thoughts and vibrations. She identifies this as the same original lie from the Garden of Eden.

  • The Teaching: LOA teaches that you are a “co-creator” with equal authority to the Creator. Scafidi warns that this shifts the focus from God’s Will to Man’s Will.
  • Scripture Used: > “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:5)
  • The Warning: This is a form of self-worship. If you believe you “attract” everything, you become the center of your universe, effectively making yourself an idol.

2. Faith vs. “Vibrational Alignment”

A major point of her talk was the distinction between biblical faith and the “frequency” or “energy” mechanics taught in New Age manifestation.

  • The Teaching: LOA teaches that the Universe is a cosmic vending machine that responds to your “vibration.” Scafidi argues that this is actually witchcraft—the attempt to control or manipulate the spiritual realm through rituals, affirmations, or mental techniques.
  • Scripture Used:“Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see.” (Hebrews 11:1)
  • The Contrast: Biblical faith is trust in a Person (Jesus Christ), while manifestation is trust in a Principle or a “Law.” Faith says, “Thy will be done”; LOA says, “My will be done.”

3. The Danger of “Positive Thinking” and Silence

Scafidi addresses the common practice in business circles of avoiding “negative” words to prevent “attracting” bad luck.

  • The Teaching: In LOA, suffering or “negative” thoughts are seen as failures of alignment. Scafidi argues this prevents Christians from reaching out for help and ignores the biblical reality of trials.
  • Scripture Used:“I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.” (John 16:33)
  • The Reality: We are called to endure trials with joy, not to pretend they don’t exist in hopes of “manifesting” them away.

4. Discerning “The Universe”

Many Christians use the term “The Universe” interchangeably with “God.” Scafidi explicitly warns against this.

  • The Teaching: “The Universe” is a created thing, not the Creator. To pray to or trust in the “Universe” is pantheism.
  • Scripture Used:“They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.” (Romans 1:25)

5. The Role of the Heart and Repentance

The summit focused on entrepreneurs, and Scafidi challenged the audience to examine their motives for wealth and success.

  • The Teaching: Many engage in LOA because they want the “blessings” of God without the “Lordship” of Christ. She calls for a “burning of the plows”—a total abandonment of New Age tools (vision boards used for manifestation, ritualistic affirmations, etc.).
  • Scripture Used:“The heart is deceitful above all things and beyond cure. Who can understand it?” (Jeremiah 17:9)
  • The Call to Action: Scafidi urges Christians to repent of trying to “command” the spiritual realm and to instead submit to the sovereignty of God.

Summary Table: Biblical Truth vs. Law of Attraction

Concept Law of Attraction (LOA) Biblical Christianity
The Source The Universe / Higher Self Jehovah (The Triune God)
The Power Your Thoughts / Words The Holy Spirit / God’s Will
The Goal Material Success / Happiness Holiness / The Glory of God
Suffering Low Vibration / Misalignment Refinement / Identification with Christ
Authority Man commands the Universe Man submits to God

Defining New Age “ungodliness” from a biblical perspective involves identifying practices that shift authority from the Creator to the self, the “Universe,” or other spiritual entities. In Christian theology, these are typically categorized as idolatry (worshiping the created), divination (seeking hidden knowledge outside of God), or sorcery (attempting to manipulate the spiritual realm).

For more on this subject: New Age Ideologies in Conflict with God

Uncategorized

The Divine Foundation of Easter

Based on Biblical prophecy, the Jewish festival calendar, and insights into the “Hebrew roots” of the New Testament, the term “10th of Nisan” means the 10th day of the first month of the year,  1

In the traditional “Passion Week” view, here is the breakdown of the days and specific times Jesus was arrested, crucified, and died:

1. The Arrest: Late Thursday Night / Early Friday Morning

According to the Gospels, Jesus celebrated the Last Supper on Thursday evening.

Time: Roughly between Midnight and 3:00 AM.

  • The Scene: After praying in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus was betrayed by Judas and arrested by a mob. He was then taken through a series of “night trials” before the High Priest and the Sanhedrin while it was still dark.

2. The Crucifixion: Friday Morning

As the sun rose on what we now call Good Friday, Jesus was moved from the Jewish leaders to the Roman Governor, Pontius Pilate.

  • The Sentence: After being scourged and mocked, He was led to Golgotha.

  • The Time: Mark 15:25 explicitly states He was crucified at the “third hour,” which in modern times is 9:00 AM.

3. The Darkness and Death: Friday Afternoon

While Jesus was on the cross, a supernatural darkness covered the land for three hours.

The Darkness: From the “sixth hour” to the “ninth hour” (12:00 PM to 3:00 PM).

  • The Death: Jesus died at the “ninth hour,” which is 3:00 PM.

  • The Significance: This is the exact time in the Jewish Temple when the afternoon Passover lambs were being sacrificed.

Summary Timeline (Modern Time)

Event Day Estimated Time
Arrest Thursday Night / Friday Morning 12:00 AM – 3:00 AM
First Trial (Pilate) Friday Morning 6:00 AM – 8:00 AM
Crucifixion Begins Friday Morning 9:00 AM
Sun Goes Dark Friday Midday 12:00 PM
Death of Jesus Friday Afternoon 3:00 PM
Burial Friday Evening Before Sunset (approx. 6:00 PM)

The Historic Link to the Passover

1. The Egyptian Passover: 10th of Nisan

In Exodus 12:3, God commanded through Moses that the Passover lamb be chosen on the 10th day of the first month. It was to live with the family for four days to be inspected for flaws.

  • The Fulfillment as the true Lamb: Jesus entered Jerusalem on a donkey (Palm Sunday) on the 10th of Nisan. Just as the lambs were being led into the city of Jerusalem for the Passover inspection, the “Lamb of God” (John 1:29) entered to be scrutinized by the Pharisees and Sadducees.
  • Prophecy: “Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion… behold, thy King cometh unto thee… riding upon an ass” (Zechariah 9:9).

2. The Preparation: 14th of Nisan (Passover)

On the 14th of Nisan, at the “twilight” (literally between the evenings), the Passover lambs were slaughtered.

  • The Fulfillment: Jesus celebrated the Last Supper (a Jewish Seder) and was arrested in Gethsemane. His trial and crucifixion occurred on the same day the lambs were being sacrificed in the Temple.
  • Prophecy: “He is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth” (Isaiah 53:7).
  • The Timing: Jesus was nailed to the cross at the third hour (9:00 AM), the same time the morning sacrifice began in Jerusalem. He died at the ninth hour (3:00 PM), the exact moment the High Priest would slay the corporate Passover lamb for the nation.

3. The Burial: Feast of Unleavened Bread

Immediately following Passover is the Feast of Unleavened Bread (Nisan 15). Leaven represents sin; bread without leaven represents purity.

  • The Fulfillment: Jesus, the “Bread of Life” born in Bethlehem (House of Bread), was placed in the tomb. He was the sinless (unleavened) sacrifice.
  • Prophecy: “For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption” (Psalm 16:10).

4. The Resurrection: Feast of Firstfruits

The Torah mandates the Feast of Firstfruits on the “morrow after the Sabbath” following Passover (Leviticus 23:11).

  • The Fulfillment: Jesus rose from the dead on the first day of the week—the Feast of Firstfruits. He is the “firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep” (1 Corinthians 15:20).
  • Prophecy: “After two days will he revive us: in the third day he will raise us up” (Hosea 6:2).

5. The Ascension: 40 Days Later

Jesus remained on earth for 40 days, appearing to many, before ascending from the Mount of Olives.

  • The Fulfillment: His ascension marked his return to the Father to act as the High Priest in the heavenly Tabernacle.
  • Prophecy: “Lift up your heads, O ye gates… and the King of glory shall come in” (Psalm 24:7-10) and the vision of the Son of Man coming to the Ancient of Days (Daniel 7:13).

The Future Advent: The Lion and the Lamb

While Jesus came first as the Lamb to take away sin, he returns as the Lion of the Tribe of Judah to execute judgment.

  • The Second Coming: Prophecy states He will return to the same location from which He left—the Mount of Olives.
  • Prophecy: “And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives…” (Zechariah 14:4).
  • The Marriage Supper: Revelation 19 describes the “Marriage Supper of the Lamb,” where the sacrifice of the 14th of Nisan reaches its ultimate prophetic conclusion.

The “mystery of the Lamb” is not just a past event but a divine universal reality that rings throughout history. The Lamb is the only one worthy to open the seals of the final judgment (Revelation 5). This suggests that the same mercy found in the Passover blood is the only protection available during the coming “Day of the Lord.”

1 Johnathan Cahn

Uncategorized

We will see His face

In Revelation 22:3–4, the phrase “no longer will anything be cursed” could mean that nothing accursed will be in God’s presence. This would fulfill Zechariah 14:11, considering that the church is now called the New Jerusalem. More likely, it refers to God lifting the curse placed in Eden (Genesis 3:17–18).

The phrase the throne of God and of the Lamb indicates the oneness of God and the Lamb, as well as God’s presence right among his people, and they will see his face. The face of God had not been seen by anyone since Adam and Eve sinned. Even Moses, the great lawgiver who went up on the mountain to meet with God, had only been able to see God from the back (Exodus 33:20).

When we are in heaven, however, God’s people will see him face-to-face (1 John 3:2). The ability to see God’s face suggests an intimate personal relationship. In addition, God’s people will have his name written on their foreheads. This points out God’s ownership. God’s people had been “sealed” by the Spirit (Rev. 7:3), and this seal previously had been described as being in the form of the Father’s name (Rev.14:1). The point is that this is the same group—God will bring his own safely to his eternal Kingdom. (Rev. 22:5)

The point that there will be no night was noted in Rev. 21:25. This indicates that there will be no more evil, no more darkness, and no more time (for God had created day and night, along with the sun and the moon, to mark the passage of time—Genesis 1:14–15). The people in the city will not need lamps or sun, for the Lord God will shine on them, as was also noted in Rev. 21:23.

The entire book of Revelation culminates in this verse: God’s people, those who have been redeemed by the blood of Jesus, will reign forever and ever (see also Daniel 7:18, 28). Eternal life is ours now and forever. (Rev. 22:6) John referred to the angel (as opposed to “an” angel), so this is probably the same angel who had shown him the heavenly city (Rev. 21:9; 22:1). The revelation closes with an angel explaining that what John has written is trustworthy and true. Throughout the ages, God has told his prophets what the future holds, and he did so again in this prophecy to John. Revelation describes what will happen soon (see also Rev. 1:1). The word “soon” means imminent and implies certainty.

Revelation 22:7-8, 9-10, 11-12, 13-14, 15-16, 17-18, 19–21 declares that Jesus is indeed coming! These verses form the epilogue to the book of Christ’s Revelation to his church. An angel attested to the prophecy’s authenticity, and at the very end, Jesus warned that the end would indeed come soon. Rev. 22:7 From Jesus himself come the words of assurance: “Look, I am coming soon!” The word “soon” (taxu) means that his coming will be quick and without delay. It may not be “soon” by human standards (after all, John wrote this two thousand years ago), but it is certain to occur; it is imminent.

Jesus clearly told his followers, “So be prepared, because you don’t know what day your Lord is coming. You also must be ready all the time. For the Son of Man will come when least expected” (Matthew 24:42, 44). Then follows the sixth of seven beatitudes in the book: “Blessed are those who obey the prophecy written in this scroll.” The other beatitudes are found in Rev. 1:3; 14:13; 16:15; 19:9; 20:6; 22:14.1 Like the beatitude at 1:3, the ones listed here promise a blessing to those who obey God by heeding the warnings of this prophecy.

1 Bruce Barton, Life Application New Testament Commentary (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 2001), 1271–1272.